From the Sanford Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD (Mr. Adams and Dr. Skelley), University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD (Dr. MacFadden, Mr. O'Connor, Ms. VanDerWolde, and Dr. Skelley), University of South Dakota, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sioux Falls, SD (Dr. MacFadden and Dr. Skelley), Viaflex, Sioux Falls, SD (Mr. Boerhave).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr 1;32(7):e331-e345. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00926. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
External fixation is a critical component of orthopaedic fracture management and is used for various conditions, including trauma and pediatric orthopaedics. However, the availability and high cost of external fixation devices are a concern, especially in rural and developing countries. 3D printing technology has shown promise in reducing manufacturing costs and improving accessibility to external fixation devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of a fully 3D-printed desktop external fixation device and compare the results with the mechanical properties of commonly used, clinically available external fixators.
A fully 3D printable external fixator was designed and printed in polylactic acid at two infill densities, 20% and 100%. The mechanical properties of the 3D-printed external fixators and several commercially available fixators were tested according to applicable sections of the American Society for Testing and Materials F1541 standard protocol in axial, medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior orientations. The primary outcomes measured included failure load, safe load, rigidity, and yield load. The mean differences between experimental and control groups were calculated using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests.
The 20% infill 3D-printed construct showed poor performance compared with commercially available external fixators in all testing conditions and across most variables. The 100% infill 3D-printed construct was comparable with or superior to all commercially available devices in most testing conditions. The cost for printing a single 3D-printed 100% infill external fixator was $14.49 (United States Dollar).
This study demonstrates that a low-cost desktop 3D printer can create an entirely 3D-printed external fixator that resists clinically relevant forces similar to medical-grade industry-standard external fixators. Therefore, there is potential for customizable and low-cost external fixators to be manufactured with desktop 3D printing for use in remote areas and other resource-constrained environments for fracture care.
外固定架是骨科骨折管理的重要组成部分,用于各种情况,包括创伤和儿科骨科。然而,外固定架设备的可用性和高成本是一个问题,特别是在农村和发展中国家。3D 打印技术在降低制造成本和提高外固定架设备的可及性方面显示出了前景。本研究的目的是评估完全 3D 打印的台式外固定架的机械性能,并将结果与常用的临床可用外固定器的机械性能进行比较。
设计并以聚乳酸为材料,在两种不同的填充密度(20%和 100%)下打印完全可 3D 打印的外固定架。根据美国测试材料协会 F1541 标准协议的适用部分,对外固定架进行轴向、内外侧和前后方向的机械性能测试。测量的主要结果包括失效负荷、安全负荷、刚性和屈服负荷。使用单向方差分析和 Tukey 检验计算实验和对照组之间的平均差异。
20%填充 3D 打印结构在所有测试条件下和大多数变量中与市售外固定器相比表现不佳。100%填充 3D 打印结构在大多数测试条件下与所有市售设备相当或优于所有市售设备。打印一个 3D 打印 100%填充外固定架的成本为 14.49 美元(美元)。
本研究表明,低成本的桌面 3D 打印机可以制造出完全 3D 打印的外固定架,能够抵抗类似医用级工业标准外固定架的临床相关力。因此,有可能使用桌面 3D 打印制造定制化和低成本的外固定架,用于骨折护理的偏远地区和其他资源有限的环境。