Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, 4D4 University Health Center, Detroit Receiving Hospital, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Int Orthop. 2013 Jul;37(7):1341-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1890-9. Epub 2013 May 4.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability and compressive forces across the sacroiliac (SI) joint of an anterior internal fixator compared to the femoral distractor and external fixator for vertically unstable pelvic fractures.
Five composite pelvises with a simulated APC type III injury fixed with a femoral distractor, external fixator, or anterior internal fixator were tested. A pressure-sensitive film (Tekscan) was placed in the disrupted SI joint recording the magnitude of force. Then, in a single-leg stance model (Instron machine), a load was applied through the sacrum. We recorded displacement at the pubic symphysis and SI joint using high-speed video. Peak load and displacement were measured, and axial stiffness was calculated. Values were compared using a Student's t-test (p < 0.05).
The SI joint was compressed significantly (p < 0.001) more using the anterior internal fixator (18.9 N) and femoral distractor (18.6 N) than the two-pin external fixator (2.5 N). There was no significant difference between the anterior internal fixator and the femoral distractor in displacement at the SI joint. The pubic symphysis displaced less with the femoral distractor than the anterior internal fixator (5.5 mm vs. 4.1 mm; p < 0.05).
The anterior pedicle screw internal fixator allows for indirect compression across the sacroiliac joint that is superior to two-pin external fixation and comparable to the femoral distractor. The anterior internal fixator may be an option for temporary anterior pelvic fixation in situations where external fixation or the femoral distractor have otherwise been used.
本研究旨在评估前路内固定器与股骨牵开器和外固定器相比,在治疗垂直不稳定骨盆骨折时对骶髂(SI)关节的生物力学稳定性和压缩力。
对 5 个复合骨盆进行测试,这些骨盆模拟 APC Ⅲ型损伤,分别用股骨牵开器、外固定器或前路内固定器固定。在破坏的 SI 关节上放置压力敏感膜(Tekscan),记录力的大小。然后,在单腿站立模型(Instron 机器)中,通过骶骨施加负载。我们使用高速摄像机记录耻骨联合和 SI 关节的位移。测量峰值负载和位移,并计算轴向刚度。使用 Student's t 检验(p < 0.05)比较值。
与双钉外固定器(2.5 N)相比,前路内固定器(18.9 N)和股骨牵开器(18.6 N)明显压缩 SI 关节(p < 0.001)。前路内固定器和股骨牵开器在 SI 关节的位移上没有显著差异。与前路内固定器相比,股骨牵开器使耻骨联合的位移更小(5.5 毫米比 4.1 毫米;p < 0.05)。
前路椎弓根螺钉内固定器可对骶髂关节进行间接压缩,优于双钉外固定器,与股骨牵开器相当。在已经使用外固定器或股骨牵开器的情况下,前路内固定器可能是临时前路骨盆固定的一种选择。