Xie Pin, Duan Zhicheng, Wei Tie, Pan Huaihong
School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.
School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120433. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120433. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
Spatial misallocation of resource elements impedes the coordination in regional co-benefit in carbon emission and pollution reduction. Guided by scope economy principles, this study aims to quantifies co-benefits and explores spatial variation patterns to facilitate mutual synergy. The findings offer valuable insights for identifying optimal focus points and shaping targeted collaborative policies. Based on the multi-source provincial panel data spanning 2000 to 2021, this paper quantitatively assesses the co-benefit through the lens of marginal abatement cost. Then, the Dagum Gini coefficient was employed to investigate the disparities at the spatial level. Additionally, geographical detector is introduced to analyze the source of disparities at the factor level. Results indicate: (1) Under joint reduction, the marginal abatement cost reduces by 57.86% and 79.97% respectively, with an overall 68.77% increase in co-benefit fluctuation. (2) Provinces with low co-benefit significantly decreased after 2007, while provinces with high co-benefit concentrated in the northwest, southwest, and east. (3) Overall disparities decreased, east-central regions hold the lowest spatial disparities in co-benefit and east-west hold the most; intragroup differences and supervariable density primarily contributes to the disparity. (4) FDI significantly influence the co-benefit over the past two decades, with spatial disparities influenced by both endogenous and exogenous factors across development stages.
资源要素的空间错配阻碍了碳排放和污染减排区域共同效益中的协同效应。本研究以范围经济原理为指导,旨在量化共同效益并探索空间变化模式,以促进相互协同。研究结果为确定最佳重点和制定有针对性的合作政策提供了有价值的见解。基于2000年至2021年的多源省级面板数据,本文从边际减排成本的角度对共同效益进行了定量评估。然后,运用达格姆基尼系数考察空间层面的差异。此外,引入地理探测器分析因素层面差异的来源。结果表明:(1)在联合减排下,边际减排成本分别降低了57.86%和79.97%,共同效益波动总体增加了68.77%。(2)共同效益较低的省份在2007年后显著减少,而共同效益较高的省份集中在西北、西南和东部。(3)总体差异减小,东中部地区在共同效益方面的空间差异最小,东西部差异最大;组内差异和超变密度是差异的主要来源。(4)在过去二十年中,外商直接投资对共同效益有显著影响,不同发展阶段的空间差异受内生和外生因素共同影响。