• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较老年患者同期双侧与单侧逆行性肾内手术。

Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly.

机构信息

University Malaya, Department of Surgery Urology Unit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Urology. 2024 Apr;186:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031
PMID:38417468
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare same-sitting bilateral vs unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in elderly patients, focusing on postoperative complications and stone-free rates (SFR).

METHODS

Data from 2 multicenter databases, FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR) (unilateral RIRS) and same sitting bilateral-retrograde intrarenal surgery (SSB-RIRS) (bilateral RIRS), were analyzed, considering only patients aged 70+ with preoperative computed tomography. Patients were categorized into Group 1 (bilateral RIRS) and Group 2 (unilateral RIRS). Follow-up included imaging assessments and secondary treatments as needed.

RESULTS

Group 1 included 146 patients, while group 2 had 495. Group 1's patients were slightly older and had a higher prevalence of recurrent stone formation. Group 2 often underwent RIRS for incidental stones. Group 1 had larger and more pelvic stones. Laser lithotripsy and total operation times were significantly longer in Group 1. Group 2 had significantly higher overall stone-free rates, although there were no significant differences in ancillary procedures for residual fragments. Group 1 experienced more pelvicalyceal injuries needing stenting, postoperative fever, and post-op hematuria not requiring transfusion.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, bilateral RIRS can be carefully considered in elderly patients. Preoperative counseling is essential for both primary and repeat RIRS procedures, and further research is needed to optimize instrument and laser strategies for better outcomes in elderly RIRS patients.

摘要

目的

比较老年患者同次坐位双侧与单侧逆行性肾内手术(RIRS),重点关注术后并发症和结石清除率(SFR)。

方法

分析了 FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry(FLEXOR)(单侧 RIRS)和同次坐位双侧逆行性肾内手术(SSB-RIRS)(双侧 RIRS)两个多中心数据库的数据,仅考虑了术前 CT 检查的 70 岁以上患者。患者分为第 1 组(双侧 RIRS)和第 2 组(单侧 RIRS)。随访包括影像学评估和根据需要进行二次治疗。

结果

第 1 组包括 146 例患者,第 2 组包括 495 例患者。第 1 组患者年龄稍大,且结石复发率较高。第 2 组常因偶然发现的结石行 RIRS。第 1 组的结石较大且多位于肾盂。第 1 组的激光碎石术和总手术时间明显更长。第 2 组的总体结石清除率明显更高,尽管在处理残余碎片的辅助手术方面没有显著差异。第 1 组发生更多需要支架置入的肾盂肾盏损伤、术后发热和术后血尿无需输血。

结论

总之,双侧 RIRS 可谨慎用于老年患者。对于初次和重复 RIRS 手术,术前咨询至关重要,需要进一步研究以优化器械和激光策略,从而改善老年 RIRS 患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Comparing Same-Sitting Bilateral vs Unilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Elderly.比较老年患者同期双侧与单侧逆行性肾内手术。
Urology. 2024 Apr;186:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.02.031. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Improving Outcomes of Same-sitting Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones in Real-world Practice-Lessons Learnt from Global Multicenter Experience of 1250 Patients.在实际临床实践中提高同期双侧软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的疗效——来自1250例患者全球多中心经验的教训
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Apr 30;52:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.018. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.逆行性肾内手术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径达15毫米的下极肾结石的比较。前瞻性随机研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study.比较铥光纤与高能钬激光双侧同期逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石:来自一项多中心研究的结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Sep;65(5):451-458. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240185.
5
Is spinal anesthesia a safe alternative for retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease in daily practice?在日常实践中,脊柱麻醉是否是治疗结石病逆行性肾内手术的安全替代方法?
Arch Esp Urol. 2022 May 28;75(4):361-367. doi: 10.37554/en-j.arch.esp.urol-20210525-3501-21.
6
Indications, preferences, global practice patterns and outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in adults: results from a multicenter database of 6669 patients of the global FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).成人肾结石逆行肾内手术(RIRS)的适应症、偏好、全球实践模式及结果:来自全球灵活输尿管镜检查结果登记处(FLEXOR)6669例患者的多中心数据库结果
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?逆行性肾内手术时是否有必要积极清除结石碎片?
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):274-9. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.274. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
8
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.微创经皮肾镜取石术:逆行性肾内手术和体外冲击波碎石术的替代方法。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1555-61. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0962-6. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
9
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.≤2厘米肾结石的软性输尿管肾镜检查与冲击波碎石术:一项随机对照试验
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1816-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones.逆行性肾内手术治疗体外冲击波碎石术治疗失败的肾结石
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(5):380-4. doi: 10.1080/00365590600679269.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative meta-analysis on bilateral same-session and unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones.双侧同期与单侧逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石的比较荟萃分析
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 26;43(1):394. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05673-7.
2
Current utility, instruments, and future directions for intra-renal pressure management during ureteroscopy: scoping review by global research in intra-renal pressure collaborative group initiative.输尿管镜检查期间肾内压管理的当前应用、器械及未来方向:全球肾内压研究协作组倡议的范围综述
Ther Adv Urol. 2025 Jan 31;17:17562872251314809. doi: 10.1177/17562872251314809. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study.
比较铥光纤与高能钬激光双侧同期逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石:来自一项多中心研究的结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Sep;65(5):451-458. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240185.