• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士和助手之间的组织信任破裂:一项定性研究。

Organizational trust breaches among nurses and aides: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Towson University.

University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2024 Dec;31(8):1524-1536. doi: 10.1177/09697330241230520. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1177/09697330241230520
PMID:38417902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349928/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare worker retention and burnout are confounding issues. Trust among workers and their employer, that is, organization, is an important yet underexplored concept in research.

RESEARCH AIM

The aim of this qualitative study is to explore organizational actions and systems that promote or denigrate trust among registered nurses and patient care aides (aides).

RESEARCH DESIGN

The study uses the Model of Psychological Contract as a theoretical framework. Focus groups were conducted to explore the concept of organizational trust and the consequences of broken trust.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered nurses (RNs) (n=6) and aides (n=6) participated in the study. Six focus groups (three RN and three aide) were conducted, with two participants per group. Focus groups were conducted online.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study's methods were reviewed by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board.

FINDINGS

Among RNs and aides, a sense of trust and feeling valued were important to their sense of relationship with their employers. Trust was breached when resources were scarce, employees did not feel validated and listened to, and problems were not addressed. RNs and aides described feeling devalued when compensation practices were unjust or inequitable, they had limited autonomy, and the employer created an organizational climate where business needs superceded human caring. Consequences of trust breach included burnout, dejection, and feelings of non-belonging.

DISCUSSION

Tangible organizational resources (compensation and staffing) and intangible resources (value, respect, autonomy) are important to RNs and aides alike. Inability to provide these resources diminishes trust and even causes a sense of betrayal.

CONCLUSION

Future research can explore the concepts of organizational justice and interventions to restore lost trust and improve healthcare worker well-being. This is one of only a few identified studies to explore organizational factors and well-being among aides and more research among this healthcare worker population is warranted.

摘要

背景

医疗保健工作者的留用和倦怠是令人困惑的问题。员工与其雇主之间的信任,即组织,是研究中一个重要但尚未充分探索的概念。

研究目的

本定性研究的目的是探讨促进或破坏注册护士和患者护理助理(助理)之间信任的组织行动和系统。

研究设计

该研究使用心理契约模型作为理论框架。进行焦点小组讨论,以探讨组织信任的概念和信任破裂的后果。

参与者

注册护士(RN)(n=6)和助理(n=6)参加了这项研究。进行了六组焦点小组(三组 RN 和三组助手),每组有两名参与者。焦点小组在线进行。

伦理考虑

匹兹堡大学机构审查委员会审查了该研究的方法。

结果

在 RN 和助手之间,信任和被重视的感觉对他们与雇主的关系感很重要。当资源稀缺、员工感到没有得到验证和倾听以及问题没有得到解决时,信任就会被打破。RN 和助手在薪酬做法不公平或不平等、他们自主权有限以及雇主创造一种组织氛围,使商业需求优先于人类关怀时,感到被贬低。信任破裂的后果包括倦怠、沮丧和归属感缺失。

讨论

有形的组织资源(薪酬和人员配备)和无形的资源(价值、尊重、自主权)对 RN 和助手同样重要。无法提供这些资源会削弱信任,甚至导致背叛感。

结论

未来的研究可以探索组织公正的概念和恢复失去的信任以及改善医疗保健工作者福祉的干预措施。这是为数不多的研究之一,探讨了助手的组织因素和幸福感,更需要对这一医疗保健工作者群体进行更多研究。

相似文献

1
Organizational trust breaches among nurses and aides: A qualitative study.护士和助手之间的组织信任破裂:一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Dec;31(8):1524-1536. doi: 10.1177/09697330241230520. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Relationships of individual and workplace characteristics With nurses' moral resilience.个体及工作场所特征与护士道德复原力的关系。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Jun;31(4):432-442. doi: 10.1177/09697330231161692. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
Transformational Nurse Leaders and Nurse Well-Being: Examining Mediating Influences of Organizational Justice and Quality of Work Life Mixed Methods Study.变革型护士领导者与护士福祉:审视组织公正和工作生活质量的中介影响 混合方法研究
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Apr 1;2025:4577350. doi: 10.1155/jonm/4577350. eCollection 2025.
4
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
5
The impact of a climate of perceived organizational support on nurses' well-being and healthcare-unit performance: A longitudinal questionnaire study.感知到的组织支持氛围对护士福祉和医疗单位绩效的影响:一项纵向问卷调查研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec;80(12):4921-4932. doi: 10.1111/jan.16188. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
"That's not my job": A mixed methods study of challenging client behaviors, boundaries, and home care aide occupational safety and health.“那不是我的工作”:一项混合方法研究,探讨了具有挑战性的客户行为、界限以及家庭保健助手的职业安全与健康。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Apr;63(4):368-378. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23082. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
[Collaboration between nurses and nurse's aides in wound care].护士与护理员在伤口护理方面的协作
Perspect Infirm. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(1):12-22.
8
Organizational politics, nurses' stress, burnout levels, turnover intention and job satisfaction.组织政治、护士的压力、倦怠程度、离职意愿和工作满意度。
Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Mar;64(1):109-116. doi: 10.1111/inr.12347. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
9
Bullying among nurses and its relationship with burnout and organizational climate.护士之间的欺凌行为及其与职业倦怠和组织氛围的关系。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):160-8. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12376. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
10
Changing Trends in Job Satisfaction and Burnout for Care Aides in Long-Term Care Homes: The Role of Work Environment.长期护理院护理助手工作满意度和职业倦怠的变化趋势:工作环境的作用
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Feb;26(2):105380. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105380. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A major-risk environment can impact nurses' expectations moderated by medical institutional trust and communication.高风险环境会影响护士的期望,而这种影响会受到医疗机构信任和沟通的调节。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 5;23(1):888. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02505-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationships of organizational behavior/mission congruence with burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction among nurses.护士职业行为/使命一致性与倦怠、二次创伤应激和同情心满足之间的关系。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Oct;73:151700. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151700. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
"A slap in the face": Institutional betrayal, burnout, and career choice regret among frontline health care workers serving COVID-19 patients.“一记耳光”:为 COVID-19 患者服务的一线医护人员遭遇的体制背叛、倦怠和职业选择遗憾。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Oct;36(5):980-992. doi: 10.1002/jts.22967. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
3
Physician and Nurse Well-Being and Preferred Interventions to Address Burnout in Hospital Practice: Factors Associated With Turnover, Outcomes, and Patient Safety.医生和护士的健康状况以及在医院实践中应对倦怠的首选干预措施:与离职、结果和患者安全相关的因素。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jul 7;4(7):e231809. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1809.
4
Treating People Fairly: The Feeling that Underlies the Trends.公平待人:趋势背后的感觉。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 May;37(4):575-578. doi: 10.1177/08901171231159711d.
5
Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Nursing Education: A National Study of Prelicensure RN Programs.评估新冠疫情对护理教育的影响:一项针对预执业注册护士项目的全国性研究。
J Nurs Regul. 2023 Apr;14(1):S1-S67. doi: 10.1016/S2155-8256(23)00041-8. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Addressing Well-being Throughout the Health Care Workforce: The Next Imperative.关注医疗保健工作队伍的福祉:下一项当务之急。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):521-522. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12437.
7
Beyond Burnout and Resilience: The Disillusionment Phase of COVID-19.超越倦怠与韧性:新冠疫情的幻想破灭阶段。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2022 Jun 15;33(2):134-142. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2022248.
8
United States nurses' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A grounded theory.美国护士在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历:扎根理论。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):2167-2180. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16032. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Voices from the COVID-19 frontline: Nurses' trauma and coping.新冠疫情一线的声音:护士的创伤与应对。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Sep;77(9):3853-3866. doi: 10.1111/jan.14988. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Healthcare is a Team Sport: Stress, Resilience, and Correlates of Well-Being Among Health System Employees in a Crisis.医疗保健是一项团队运动:危机中卫生系统员工的压力、适应力和幸福感的相关因素。
J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(4):304-322. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00288.