Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3302-3313. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15038-w. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Prior works have studied the impact of social determinants on various cancers but there is limited analysis on eye-orbit cancers. Current literature tends to focus on socioeconomic status and race, with sparse analysis of interdisciplinary contributions. We examined social determinants as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), quantifying eye and orbit melanoma disparities across the United States.
A retrospective review of 15,157 patients diagnosed with eye-orbit cancers in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2017 was performed, extracting 6139 ocular melanomas. SVI scores were abstracted and matched to SEER patient data, with scores generated by weighted averages per population density of county's census tracts. Primary outcome was months survived, while secondary outcomes were advanced staging, high grading, and primary surgery receipt.
With increased total SVI score, indicating more vulnerability, we observed significant decreases of 23.1% in months survival for melanoma histology (p < 0.001) and 19.6-39.7% by primary site. Increasing total SVI showed increased odds of higher grading (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.43) and decreased odds of surgical intervention (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96). Of the four themes, higher magnitude contributions were observed with socioeconomic status (26.0%) and housing transportation (14.4%), while lesser magnitude contributions were observed with minority language status (13.5%) and household composition (9.0%).
Increasing social vulnerability, as measured by the CDC SVI and its subscores, displayed significant detrimental trends in prognostic and treatment factors for adult eye-orbit melanoma. Subscores quantified which social determinants contributed most to disparities. This lays groundwork for providers to target the highest-impact social determinant for non-clinical factors in patient care.
先前的研究已经研究了社会决定因素对各种癌症的影响,但对眼窝癌的分析有限。目前的文献往往侧重于社会经济地位和种族,对跨学科贡献的分析很少。我们检查了疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)社会脆弱性指数(SVI)衡量的社会决定因素,量化了美国眼窝黑素瘤的差异。
对 1975 年至 2017 年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中诊断为眼窝癌的 15157 例患者进行回顾性分析,提取 6139 例眼部黑色素瘤。提取 SVI 评分并与 SEER 患者数据匹配,评分通过县普查区人口密度的加权平均值生成。主要结果是存活月数,次要结果是晚期分期、高级分级和初级手术接受情况。
随着总 SVI 评分的增加,表明脆弱性增加,我们观察到黑色素瘤组织学的存活月数显著下降 23.1%(p<0.001),原发部位下降 19.6-39.7%。总 SVI 增加表明高级分级的可能性增加(比值比[OR]1.20,95%置信区间[CI]1.02-1.43),手术干预的可能性降低(OR 0.94,95%CI 0.92-0.96)。在四个主题中,社会经济地位(26.0%)和住房交通(14.4%)的贡献幅度较大,而少数民族语言地位(13.5%)和家庭构成(9.0%)的贡献幅度较小。
CDC SVI 及其子评分衡量的社会脆弱性增加,对成人眼窝黑素瘤的预后和治疗因素显示出显著的不利趋势。子评分量化了哪些社会决定因素对差异的贡献最大。这为提供者为患者护理中的非临床因素确定影响最大的社会决定因素奠定了基础。