Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL) - Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.
McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10744-3.
Evidence networks facilitate the exchange of information and foster international relationships among researchers and stakeholders. These networks are instrumental in enabling the integration of scientific evidence into decision-making processes. While there is a global emphasis on evidence-based decision-making at policy and organisational levels, there exists a significant gap in our understanding of the most effective activities to exchange scientific knowledge and use it in practice. The objective of this rapid review was to explore the strategies employed by evidence networks to facilitate the translation of evidence into decision-making processes. This review makes a contribution to global health policymaking by mapping the landscape of knowledge translation in this context and identifying the evidence translation activities that evidence networks have found effective.
The review was guided by standardised techniques for conducting rapid evidence reviews. Document searching was based on a phased approach, commencing with a comprehensive initial search strategy and progressively refining it with each subsequent search iterations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed.
The review identified 143 articles, after screening 1135 articles. Out of these, 35 articles were included in the review. The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 14), followed by Canada (n = 5), Sweden (n = 2), and various other single locations (n = 14). These studies presented a varied set of implementation strategies such as research-related activities, the creation of teams/task forces/partnerships, meetings/consultations, mobilising/working with communities, influencing policy, activity evaluation, training, trust-building, and regular meetings, as well as community-academic-policymaker engagement.
Evidence networks play a crucial role in developing, sharing, and implementing high-quality research for policy. These networks face challenges like coordinating diverse stakeholders, international collaboration, language barriers, research consistency, knowledge dissemination, capacity building, evaluation, and funding. To enhance their impact, sharing network efforts with wider audiences, including local, national, and international agencies, is essential for evidence-based decision-making to shape evidence-informed policies and programmes effectively.
证据网络促进了信息交流,并增进了研究人员和利益相关者之间的国际合作关系。这些网络在将科学证据纳入决策过程中发挥了重要作用。尽管在政策和组织层面上全球都强调循证决策,但我们对于最有效的交流科学知识和将其付诸实践的活动的理解仍存在重大差距。本次快速审查的目的是探讨证据网络所采用的策略,以促进证据向决策过程的转化。本研究通过绘制这一背景下知识转化的图谱,并确定证据网络认为有效的证据转化活动,为全球卫生政策制定做出了贡献。
本审查遵循了进行快速证据审查的标准化技术。文献检索基于分阶段的方法,从全面的初始搜索策略开始,并在每个后续搜索迭代中逐步对其进行细化。本研究遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)声明。
经过筛选 1135 篇文章,本次审查共确定了 143 篇文章。其中,有 35 篇文章被纳入审查。这些研究涵盖了多个国家,其中美国(n=14)的研究最多,其次是加拿大(n=5)、瑞典(n=2)和其他多个单一地点(n=14)。这些研究提出了一系列不同的实施策略,如研究相关活动、团队/工作组/伙伴关系的建立、会议/磋商、动员/与社区合作、影响政策、活动评估、培训、建立信任和定期会议,以及社区-学术-政策制定者的参与。
证据网络在制定、分享和实施高质量政策研究方面发挥着关键作用。这些网络面临着协调不同利益相关者、国际合作、语言障碍、研究一致性、知识传播、能力建设、评估和资金等挑战。为了提高其影响力,与更广泛的受众(包括地方、国家和国际机构)分享网络工作,对于基于证据的决策以有效地制定循证政策和计划至关重要。