Smith Ariell Marie, Inocencio Dominique Gabriele, Pardi Brandon Michael, Gopinath Arvind, Andresen Eguiluz Roberto Carlos
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, California 95344, United States.
Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, California 95344, United States.
ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2024 Feb 5;6(4):2405-2416. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.3c03154. eCollection 2024 Feb 23.
Polyacrylamide hydrogels (PAH gel) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, an elastomer) are two soft materials often used in cell mechanics and mechanobiology, in manufacturing lab-on-a-chip applications, among others. This is partly due to the ability to tune their elasticity with ease in addition to various chemical modifications. For affine polymeric networks, two (of three) elastic constants, Young's modulus (), the shear modulus (), and Poisson's ratio (ν), describe the purely elastic response to external forces. However, the literature addressing the experimental determination of ν for PAH (sometimes called PAA gels in the literature) and the PDMS elastomer is surprisingly limited when compared to the literature that reports values of the elastic moduli, and . Here, we present a facile method to obtain the Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus for PAH gel and PDMS elastomer based on static tensile tests. The value of ν obtained from the deformation of the sample is compared to the value determined by comparing and via a second independent method that utilizes small amplitude shear rheology. We show that the Poisson's ratio may vary significantly from the value for incompressible materials (ν = 0.5), often assumed in the literature even for soft compressible hydrogels. Surprisingly, we find a high degree of agreement between elastic constants obtained by shear rheology and macroscopic static tension test data for polyacrylamide hydrogels but not for elastomeric PDMS.
聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶(PAH凝胶)和聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS,一种弹性体)是细胞力学和力学生物学中常用的两种软材料,也用于制造芯片实验室应用等。部分原因是除了各种化学修饰外,它们还能够轻松调节弹性。对于仿射聚合物网络,三个弹性常数中的两个,即杨氏模量()、剪切模量()和泊松比(ν),描述了对外力的纯弹性响应。然而,与报道弹性模量值和的文献相比,关于PAH(文献中有时称为PAA凝胶)和PDMS弹性体泊松比实验测定的文献出奇地有限。在这里,我们提出了一种基于静态拉伸试验获得PAH凝胶和PDMS弹性体泊松比和杨氏模量的简便方法。将从样品变形中获得的ν值与通过利用小振幅剪切流变学的第二种独立方法比较和确定的值进行比较。我们表明,泊松比可能与不可压缩材料的值(ν = 0.5)有很大差异,即使对于软可压缩水凝胶,文献中也经常假设该值。令人惊讶的是,我们发现通过剪切流变学获得的弹性常数与聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶的宏观静态拉伸试验数据之间高度一致,但对于弹性PDMS则不然。