• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解学习者对ChatGPT的看法:对中国本科生和研究生同伴访谈的主题分析

Understanding learners' perceptions of ChatGPT: A thematic analysis of peer interviews among undergraduates and postgraduates in China.

作者信息

Xu Xiaoshu, Su Yujie, Zhang Yunfeng, Wu Yunyang, Xu Xinyu

机构信息

School of Foreign Studies, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Stamford International University Thailand.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26239. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239
PMID:38420484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10900412/
Abstract

ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven language model engineered by OpenAI, has experienced a substantial upsurge in adoption within higher education due to its versatile applications and sophisticated capabilities. Although prevailing research on ChatGPT has predominantly concentrated on its technological aspects and pedagogical ramifications, a comprehensive understanding of students' perceptions and experiences regarding ChatGPT remains elusive. To address this gap, this study employed a peer interview methodology, conducting a thematic analysis of 106 first-year undergraduates and 81 first-year postgraduate students' perceptions from diverse disciplines at a comprehensive university in East China. The data analysis revealed that among the four factors examined-grade, age, gender, and major-grade emerged as the most influential determinant, followed by age and major. Postgraduate students demonstrated heightened awareness of the potential limitations of ChatGPT in addressing academic challenges and exhibited greater concern for security issues associated with its application. This research offers essential insights into students' perceptions and experiences with ChatGPT, emphasizing the importance of recognizing potential limitations and ethical concerns associated with ChatGPT usage. Additionally, the findings highlight ethical concerns, as students noted the importance of responsible data handling and academic integrity in ChatGPT usage, underscoring the need for ethical guidance in AI utilization. Moreover, further research is essential to optimize AI use in education, aiming to improve learning outcomes effectively.

摘要

ChatGPT是由OpenAI研发的一种人工智能驱动的语言模型,由于其广泛的应用和复杂的功能,在高等教育中的应用急剧增加。尽管目前关于ChatGPT的研究主要集中在其技术方面和教学影响,但对于学生对ChatGPT的看法和体验仍缺乏全面的了解。为了填补这一空白,本研究采用了同伴访谈方法,对华东一所综合性大学不同学科的106名本科一年级学生和81名硕士一年级学生的看法进行了主题分析。数据分析表明,在考察的四个因素——年级、年龄、性别和专业中,年级是最具影响力的决定因素,其次是年龄和专业。研究生对ChatGPT在应对学术挑战方面的潜在局限性有更高的认识,并对其应用相关的安全问题表现出更大的关注。本研究为学生对ChatGPT的看法和体验提供了重要见解,强调了认识到与ChatGPT使用相关的潜在局限性和伦理问题的重要性。此外,研究结果凸显了伦理问题,因为学生们指出了在ChatGPT使用中负责任的数据处理和学术诚信的重要性,强调了在人工智能使用中进行伦理指导的必要性。此外,进一步的研究对于优化教育中的人工智能使用至关重要,旨在有效提高学习成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3513/10900412/a77d27b3b188/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3513/10900412/fcf07d0de274/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3513/10900412/a77d27b3b188/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3513/10900412/fcf07d0de274/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3513/10900412/a77d27b3b188/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding learners' perceptions of ChatGPT: A thematic analysis of peer interviews among undergraduates and postgraduates in China.了解学习者对ChatGPT的看法:对中国本科生和研究生同伴访谈的主题分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(4):e26239. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
ChatGPT for Academic Purposes: Survey Among Undergraduate Healthcare Students in Malaysia.用于学术目的的ChatGPT:马来西亚本科医学生的调查
Cureus. 2024 Jan 27;16(1):e53032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53032. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT) for Health Sciences Students: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.人工智能聊天机器人(ChatGPT)对健康科学专业学生的可用性和有效性:一项交叉随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 24;12:e51873. doi: 10.2196/51873.
4
The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the adoption and impact of AI ChatGPT: Challenges, applications, and ethical considerations.新冠疫情对人工智能 ChatGPT 的采用和影响:挑战、应用和伦理考量。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Jun;246:104264. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104264. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Incorporating ChatGPT in Medical Informatics Education: Mixed Methods Study on Student Perceptions and Experiential Integration Proposals.将 ChatGPT 融入医学信息学教育:学生认知和体验融入建议的混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Mar 20;10:e51151. doi: 10.2196/51151.
6
A longitudinal study on artificial intelligence adoption: understanding the drivers of ChatGPT usage behavior change in higher education.一项关于人工智能采用情况的纵向研究:理解高等教育中ChatGPT使用行为变化的驱动因素。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jan 5;6:1324398. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1324398. eCollection 2023.
7
ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students' Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy.学习中的ChatGPT:从感知价值的视角评估学生的使用意图以及人工智能素养的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(9):845. doi: 10.3390/bs14090845.
8
Benefit-Risk Assessment of ChatGPT Applications in the Field of Diabetes and Metabolic Illnesses: A Qualitative Study.ChatGPT在糖尿病和代谢性疾病领域应用的效益-风险评估:一项定性研究
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2024 Mar 15;17:11795514241235514. doi: 10.1177/11795514241235514. eCollection 2024.
9
Enhancing AI competence in health management: students' experiences with ChatGPT as a learning Tool.提升健康管理中的人工智能能力:学生对 ChatGPT 作为学习工具的体验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 30;24(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05595-9.
10
Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives.高等教育中ChatGPT使用的驱动因素与后果:关键利益相关者观点
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):2599-2614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13110181.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher education students' perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions.高等教育学生对ChatGPT的认知:一项关于早期反应的全球研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 5;20(2):e0315011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315011. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, Plagiarism and Basic Honesty: Comment.人工智能、聊天机器人、剽窃与基本诚信:评论
Cell Mol Bioeng. 2023 Feb 17;16(2):173-174. doi: 10.1007/s12195-023-00759-x. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
ChatGPT: five priorities for research.ChatGPT:研究的五个优先事项。
Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7947):224-226. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7.
3
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists.由ChatGPT撰写的摘要愚弄了科学家。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7.
4
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views.人工智能与初级医疗保健的未来:对英国全科医生观点的探索性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 20;21(3):e12802. doi: 10.2196/12802.
5
II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT: THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES.二、不仅仅是方便:同质便利样本的科学价值。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2017 Jun;82(2):13-30. doi: 10.1111/mono.12296.
6
Power relations in qualitative research.定性研究中的权力关系。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Feb;19(2):279-89. doi: 10.1177/1049732308329306.