Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Unit for Anesthesiological Investigations, Department of Acute Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Apr 1;136(4):928-937. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00881.2023. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
Abdominal inflation with CO is used to facilitate laparoscopic surgeries, however, providing adequate mechanical ventilation in this scenario is of major importance during anesthesia management. We characterized high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) in protecting from the gas exchange and respiratory mechanical impairments during capnoperitoneum. In addition, we aimed to assess the difference between conventional pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) and HFPV modalities generating the high-frequency signal intratracheally (HFPVi) or extrathoracally (HFPVe). Anesthetized rabbits ( = 16) were mechanically ventilated by random sequences of CMV, HFPVi, and HFPVe. The ventilator superimposed the conventional waveform with two high-frequency signals (5 Hz and 10 Hz) during intratracheal HFPV (HFPVi) and HFPV with extrathoracic application of oscillatory signals through a sealed chest cuirass (HFPVe). Lung oxygenation index ([Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt), and respiratory mechanics were assessed before abdominal inflation, during capnoperitoneum, and after abdominal deflation. Compared with CMV, HFPVi with additional 5-Hz oscillations during capnoperitoneum resulted in higher [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text], lower [Formula: see text], and decreased Qs/Qt. These improvements were smaller but remained significant during HFPVi with 10 Hz and HFPVe with either 5 or 10 Hz. The ventilation modes did not protect against capnoperitoneum-induced deteriorations in respiratory tissue mechanics. These findings suggest that high-frequency oscillations combined with conventional pressure-controlled ventilation improved lung oxygenation and CO removal in a model of capnoperitoneum. Compared with extrathoracic pressure oscillations, intratracheal generation of oscillatory pressure bursts appeared more effective. These findings may contribute to the optimization of mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery. The present study examines an alternative and innovative mechanical ventilation modality in improving oxygen delivery, CO clearance, and respiratory mechanical abnormalities in a clinically relevant experimental model of capnoperitoneum. Our data reveal that high-frequency oscillations combined with conventional ventilation improve gas exchange, with intratracheal oscillations being more effective than extrathoracic oscillations in this clinically relevant translational model.
腹部充气用 CO 用于促进腹腔镜手术,但在麻醉管理期间,提供足够的机械通气在这方面是非常重要的。我们在气腹期间对高频叩击通气 (HFPV) 防止气体交换和呼吸力学损伤的特性进行了描述。此外,我们旨在评估传统压力控制机械通气 (CMV) 和高频信号经气管内 (HFPVi) 或胸外 (HFPVe) 产生的 HFPV 模式之间的差异。通过随机序列的 CMV、HFPVi 和 HFPVe 对麻醉兔进行机械通气。在气管内高频叩击通气 (HFPVi) 和胸腔外应用振荡信号的密封胸铠 (HFPVe) 中,呼吸机在常规波形上叠加两个高频信号 (5 Hz 和 10 Hz)。在腹部充气前、气腹期间和腹部放气后评估肺氧合指数 ([Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text])、动脉二氧化碳分压 ([Formula: see text])、肺内分流 (Qs/Qt) 和呼吸力学。与 CMV 相比,在气腹期间附加 5-Hz 振荡的 HFPVi 导致更高的 [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]、更低的 [Formula: see text] 和降低的 Qs/Qt。这些改善在 HFPVi 中使用 10 Hz 和 HFPVe 中使用 5 或 10 Hz 时较小,但仍有统计学意义。这些通气模式不能防止气腹引起的呼吸组织力学恶化。这些发现表明,高频振荡与传统压力控制通气相结合可改善气腹模型中的肺氧合和 CO 清除。与胸腔外压力振荡相比,气管内产生的振荡压力脉冲似乎更有效。这些发现可能有助于优化腹腔镜手术中的机械通气。本研究在气腹的临床相关实验模型中,检验了一种替代和创新的机械通气方式,以改善氧输送、CO 清除和呼吸力学异常。我们的数据表明,高频振荡与常规通气相结合可改善气体交换,在这个临床相关的转化模型中,气管内振荡比胸腔外振荡更有效。