School of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299806. eCollection 2024.
Biomedical research reporting guidelines provide a framework by which journal editors and the researchers who conduct studies can ensure that the reported research is both complete and transparent. With more than 16 different guidelines for the 11 major study types of medical and health research, authors need to be familiar with journal reporting standards. To assess the current endorsements of reporting guidelines for biomedical and health research, this study examined the instructions for authors (IFAs) of 559 biomedical journals by 11 prominent publishers that publish original research or systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Data from the above original sources were cleaned and restructured, and analyzed in a database and text miner. Each journal's instructions or information for authors were examined to code if any of five prominent reporting guidelines were mentioned and what form the guideline adherence demonstration took. Seventeen journals published the reporting guidelines. Four of the five reporting guidelines listed journals as endorsers. For journals with open peer review reports, a sample of journals and peer reviews was analyzed for mention of adherence to reporting guidelines. The endorsement of research guidelines by publishers and their associated journals is inconsistent for some publishers, with only a small number of journals endorsing relevant guidelines. Based on the analysis of open peer reviews, there is evidence that some reviewers check the adherence to the endorsed reporting guidelines. Currently, there is no universal endorsement of reporting guidelines by publishers nor ways of demonstrating adherence to guidelines. Journals may not directly inform authors of their guideline endorsements, making it more difficult for authors to adhere to endorsed guidelines. Suggestions derived from the findings are provided for authors, journals, and reporting guidelines to ensure increased adequate use of endorsed reporting guidelines.
生物医学研究报告指南为期刊编辑和进行研究的研究人员提供了一个框架,以确保报告的研究既完整又透明。对于医学和健康研究的 11 种主要研究类型,有超过 16 种不同的指南,作者需要熟悉期刊报告标准。为了评估生物医学和健康研究报告指南的当前认可情况,本研究检查了 11 家知名出版商的 559 种生物医学期刊的作者指南(IFAs),这些出版商出版原始研究或系统评价/荟萃分析。上述原始数据被清理和重构,并在数据库和文本挖掘器中进行分析。检查每个期刊的说明或作者信息,以编码是否提到了五个突出的报告指南中的任何一个,以及指南遵守情况的展示形式。有 17 种期刊发表了报告指南。列出的期刊中有 4 种对五个报告指南中的 5 个表示认可。对于具有公开同行评审报告的期刊,分析了部分期刊和同行评审,以了解是否提及遵守报告指南。出版商及其相关期刊对研究指南的认可不一致,只有少数期刊认可相关指南。根据对公开同行评审的分析,有证据表明一些评审员检查了对认可的报告指南的遵守情况。目前,出版商对报告指南没有普遍认可,也没有展示遵守指南的方法。期刊可能不会直接告知作者其对指南的认可情况,这使得作者更难遵守认可的指南。从研究结果中提出了一些建议,供作者、期刊和报告指南使用,以确保更广泛地使用认可的报告指南。