Reeder G S, Smith H C, Elveback L R, Mock M B
Cardiovasc Clin. 1985;15(1):17-31.
A wide spectrum of coronary arteriographic anatomic findings exists in patients presenting with clinically stable and unstable angina pectoris. Although some generalizations about the clinical-angiographic correlations can be made, we are continuously reminded of the frequent individual patient whose findings fall well outside of these generalizations. The majority of patients will have double- or triple-vessel coronary disease, with approximately 10 percent having in addition a left main coronary artery stenosis of at least 50 percent luminal diameter narrowing. Patients with unstable angina tend to have slightly greater vessel involvement in terms of lesion severity, though major differences, in general, are not seen. Intracoronary thrombus is present more frequently in patients with unstable angina and in those with recent myocardial infarction, though the overall incidence of this finding is low. Knowledge of the anatomic extent of coronary atherosclerosis is useful for determining prognosis and for selection from an ever-increasing variety of medical and surgical treatment options. Cardiac imaging is a continuously evolving field with new techniques such as digital angiography, three-dimensional dynamic imaging (dynamic spatial reconstructor), and nuclear magnetic resonance undergoing preclinical or clinical evaluation. These modalities hold promise for ultimately evaluating the coronary vessels from unlimited angles, assessing regional transmural myocardial perfusion and the cellular metabolic consequences of ischemia. However, current therapies (bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty) are based upon modifications of major epicardial coronary anatomy, and techniques that adequately define this anatomy are required. Moreover, for imaging data to have prognostic application, it must have previously established clinical prognostic correlates and be broadly applicable or widely available for patients. Thus for the present and immediate foreseeable future, coronary angiography will be the primary method for establishing the anatomic abnormalities of the coronary arteries, and these angiographic studies will remain vital for the clinical management of ischemic heart disease.
在表现为临床稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛的患者中,存在广泛的冠状动脉造影解剖学发现。尽管可以对临床与血管造影的相关性进行一些概括,但我们不断提醒自己,经常有个别患者的发现远远超出这些概括。大多数患者将患有双支或三支冠状动脉疾病,另外约10%的患者左主干冠状动脉狭窄至少达到管腔直径狭窄50%。不稳定型心绞痛患者在病变严重程度方面往往有稍多的血管受累,不过总体上未见重大差异。冠状动脉内血栓在不稳定型心绞痛患者和近期心肌梗死患者中更常见,尽管这一发现的总体发生率较低。了解冠状动脉粥样硬化的解剖范围对于确定预后以及从日益增多的药物和手术治疗选择中进行选择很有用。心脏成像领域不断发展,数字血管造影、三维动态成像(动态空间重建仪)和核磁共振等新技术正在进行临床前或临床评估。这些方法有望最终从无限角度评估冠状动脉,评估区域透壁心肌灌注以及缺血的细胞代谢后果。然而,目前的治疗方法(搭桥手术或冠状动脉成形术)是基于对主要心外膜冠状动脉解剖结构的改变,因此需要能够充分界定这种解剖结构的技术。此外,为了使成像数据具有预后应用价值,它必须先前已建立临床预后相关性,并且对患者具有广泛适用性或广泛可得性。因此,在目前和可预见的近期未来,冠状动脉造影仍将是确定冠状动脉解剖异常的主要方法,并且这些血管造影研究对于缺血性心脏病的临床管理仍将至关重要。