Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases, Ministry of Education/Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Vaccine. 2024 Mar 19;42(8):1883-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.059. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Under the global risk of epidemic rebound of influenza after COVID-19 outbreak, the study aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) and to explore the potential effect modifiers.
We searched for test-negative design studies with IVE estimates published between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. We estimated pooled IVE using random-effects meta-analysis, and conducted meta-regression with study site, age, sex and comorbidity as explanatory variables.
We identified 2429 publications and included 191 in the meta-analysis. The pooled IVE was 41.4 % (95 % CI: 39.2-43.5 %) against any influenza. For specific strains, the IVE was 55.4 % (95 % CI: 52.7-58.1 %) against A/H1N1, 26.8 % (95 % CI: 23.5-29.9 %) against A/H3N2, 47.2 % (95 % CI: 38.1-54.9 %) against B/Yamagata, and 40.6 % (95 % CI: 23.7-53.7 %) against B/Victoria, and the effectiveness against A/H3N2 was significantly lower than A/H1N1 (p < 0.0001) and B/Yamagata (p < 0.0001). The pooled IVE was 39.2 % (95 % CI: 36.5-41.9 %) in preventing influenza-associated outpatient visit and 43.7 % (95 % CI: 39.7-47.4 %) in preventing influenza-related hospitalization. The IVE against any influenza was 48.6 % (95 % CI: 44.7-52.2 %) for children aged < 18 years, 36.7 % (95 % CI: 31.9-41.1 %) for adults aged 18-64 years, and 30.6 % (95 % CI: 26.2-34.8 %) for elderly aged ≥65 years. Meta-regression revealed that the IVE was associated with the average age of study participants, in which both young adults [relative odds ratio (ROR) = 1.225, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.099-1.365, p = 0.0002] and elderly (ROR = 1.245, 95 % CI: 1.083-1.431, p = 0.002) manifested a significantly decreased effectiveness compared with children.
Influenza vaccines provided moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza and related outpatient visit and hospitalization. However, the effectiveness may vary substantially by virus type and age group, suggesting the necessity to tailor vaccination strategies especially for older individuals and against the A/H3N2 strain, and to promote annual immunization and annual analysis of vaccine effectiveness.
在 COVID-19 疫情后全球流感反弹的风险下,本研究旨在全面评估季节性流感疫苗的有效性(IVE),并探索潜在的效应修饰因素。
我们检索了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的使用测试阴性设计研究评估 IVE 的研究。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析估计汇总 IVE,并使用研究地点、年龄、性别和合并症作为解释变量进行荟萃回归。
我们确定了 2429 篇出版物,并纳入了 191 项荟萃分析。针对任何流感的汇总 IVE 为 41.4%(95%CI:39.2-43.5%)。针对特定毒株,IVE 对 A/H1N1 为 55.4%(95%CI:52.7-58.1%),对 A/H3N2 为 26.8%(95%CI:23.5-29.9%),对 B/Yamagata 为 47.2%(95%CI:38.1-54.9%),对 B/Victoria 为 40.6%(95%CI:23.7-53.7%),A/H3N2 的有效性明显低于 A/H1N1(p<0.0001)和 B/Yamagata(p<0.0001)。汇总的 IVE 可预防 49.2%(95%CI:46.5-51.9%)流感相关门诊就诊和 43.7%(95%CI:39.7-47.4%)流感相关住院治疗。任何流感的 IVE 对年龄<18 岁的儿童为 48.6%(95%CI:44.7-52.2%),对 18-64 岁的成年人为 36.7%(95%CI:31.9-41.1%),对≥65 岁的老年人为 30.6%(95%CI:26.2-34.8%)。荟萃回归显示,IVE 与研究参与者的平均年龄相关,其中年轻成年人(相对优势比(ROR)=1.225,95%置信区间(CI):1.099-1.365,p=0.0002)和老年人(ROR=1.245,95%CI:1.083-1.431,p=0.002)与儿童相比,有效性显著降低。
流感疫苗对实验室确诊的流感及相关门诊就诊和住院治疗提供了中等程度的保护。然而,有效性可能因病毒类型和年龄组而有很大差异,这表明有必要针对老年人和 A/H3N2 株制定特定的疫苗接种策略,并促进每年免疫接种和每年分析疫苗的有效性。