Presa Jesus, Arranz-Herrero Javier, Alvarez-Losa Laura, Rius-Rocabert Sergio, Pozuelo Maria Jose, Lalueza Antonio, Ochando Jordi, Eiros Jose María, Sanz-Muñoz Ivan, Nistal-Villan Estanislao
Independent researcher, Madrid, Spain.
Microbiology Section, Dpto. CC, Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid.
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Jan 8;34(175). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0144-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
The morbidity and mortality associated with influenza viruses are a significant public health challenge. Annual vaccination against circulating influenza strains reduces hospitalisations and increases survival rates but requires a yearly redesign of vaccines against prevalent subtypes. The complex genetics of influenza viruses with high antigenic drift create an ongoing challenge in vaccine development to address dynamic influenza epidemiology. Understanding the evolution of influenza viruses and the vaccine's effectiveness against different types and subtypes is pivotal to designing public health measures against influenza.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 192 705 patients, collecting information on the incidence and severity of the disease. The results of this meta-analysis were further validated using data from 6 594 765 patients from TriNetX. We analysed the prevalence of the most common influenza A virus (IAV) subtypes (H1N1 and H3N2) and influenza B virus (IBV), as well as vaccination effectiveness against them in three age groups, given that age is associated with influenza disease severity.
Our analysis reflects that overall vaccination against H1N1 IAV and IBV is effective in reducing infection and influenza-related complications in children aged <5 years old, individuals between 5 and 65 years old and older adults aged >65 years old. By contrast, while vaccination against H3N2 IAV is effective in protecting against infection in infants <5 years old, it provides reduced protection against infection in older individuals.
Despite higher infection rates, vaccination against H3N2 remains as highly effective as vaccination against H1N1 and IBV in reducing influenza-related morbidity and mortality in all age groups. Detailing vaccine effectiveness in terms of infection protection and disease burden across different age groups is necessary for understanding vaccine impacts in terms of other outcomes, hospitalisations, mortality and disease severity; for improving vaccine formulations and public awareness; and for enhancing vaccination campaigns to improve coverage and public acceptance.
流感病毒相关的发病率和死亡率是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。每年针对流行的流感毒株进行疫苗接种可减少住院率并提高生存率,但需要每年重新设计针对流行亚型的疫苗。流感病毒复杂的遗传学特性以及高抗原漂移现象给疫苗研发带来了持续挑战,以应对动态变化的流感流行病学。了解流感病毒的演变以及疫苗针对不同类型和亚型的有效性对于设计流感公共卫生防控措施至关重要。
我们对192705名患者进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,收集了有关疾病发病率和严重程度的信息。该荟萃分析的结果使用来自TriNetX的6594765名患者的数据进一步验证。鉴于年龄与流感疾病严重程度相关,我们分析了最常见的甲型流感病毒(IAV)亚型(H1N1和H3N2)和乙型流感病毒(IBV)的流行情况,以及在三个年龄组中针对它们的疫苗接种有效性。
我们的分析表明,总体而言,针对H1N1 IAV和IBV的疫苗接种在降低5岁以下儿童、5至65岁个体和65岁以上老年人的感染及流感相关并发症方面是有效的。相比之下,虽然针对H3N2 IAV的疫苗接种在预防5岁以下婴儿感染方面有效,但在老年个体中提供的感染防护效果降低。
尽管感染率较高,但在降低所有年龄组的流感相关发病率和死亡率方面,针对H3N2的疫苗接种与针对H1N1和IBV的疫苗接种一样有效。详细说明不同年龄组在感染防护和疾病负担方面的疫苗有效性,对于从住院、死亡率和疾病严重程度等其他结果理解疫苗影响、改进疫苗配方和公众意识以及加强疫苗接种运动以提高覆盖率和公众接受度而言是必要的。