Leblanc A Boudreau, Williams-Jones B
J Int Bioethique Ethique Sci. 2024;34(3):103-124. doi: 10.3917/jibes.343.0103.
The idea of collaborative governance is gaining popularity. However, how can it be truly collaborative? Decision-making systems with diverse stakeholders must deal with different positions, roles, interests, missions, observations, and values. The co P·R·I·M·O·V (Position, Role, Interest, Mission, Observation, Values) bioethics tool aims to improve the practice of sustainable, collaborative, and democratic development of technosocial initiatives through its user-friendly format for professional ethicists. The tool follows the logic of Conflict of Interest (CoI) analysis used in organizational ethics frameworks. CoI, as an analytical unit in ethics, allows the anticipation and management of problems that may compromise the short- and long-term activities of a program and its governance. This tool was built on a case study for the implementation of monitoring of antibiotic use in animal health in Quebec, Canada. The use of this bioethics tool is strategic and can help negotiate positions and thus co-construct a common frame of reference between the stakeholders in view of a collaborative governance favoring cooperation.
协作治理的理念正日益受到欢迎。然而，如何才能实现真正的协作呢？拥有不同利益相关者的决策系统必须应对不同的立场、角色、利益、使命、观点和价值观。共同的P·R·I·M·O·V（立场、角色、利益、使命、观点、价值观）生物伦理工具旨在通过其面向专业伦理学家的用户友好格式，改善技术社会倡议的可持续、协作和民主发展实践。该工具遵循组织伦理框架中使用的利益冲突（CoI）分析逻辑。作为伦理分析单元的利益冲突，有助于预见和管理可能损害项目及其治理的短期和长期活动的问题。此工具基于加拿大魁北克省动物健康抗生素使用监测实施的案例研究构建。这种生物伦理工具的使用具有战略意义，有助于协商各方立场，从而在利益相关者之间共同构建一个共同的参考框架，以促进有利于合作的协作治理。
