Sung Pildoo, Lim-Soh Jeremy, Malhotra Rahul
Department of Sociology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):693-708. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2319535. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
Little is known about whether and why social networks protect mental health among informal caregivers. This study examined the association between informal caregiver social network types and depressive symptoms and the mediatory mechanism of psychological resilience. Latent class analysis, applied to cross-sectional data on 278 Singaporean caregivers, identified four social network types: restricted (42%), friend (16%), family (21%), and diverse (21%). Path analysis showed that the diverse social network type, compared to the restricted social network type, was associated with a lower level of depressive symptoms, and psychological resilience fully mediated this association. Interventions should help caregivers to maintain social networks with their family and friends.
对于社交网络是否以及为何能保护非正式照料者的心理健康,我们知之甚少。本研究考察了非正式照料者社交网络类型与抑郁症状之间的关联以及心理韧性的中介机制。对278名新加坡照料者的横断面数据进行潜在类别分析,确定了四种社交网络类型:受限型(42%)、朋友型(16%)、家庭型(21%)和多样型(21%)。路径分析表明,与受限型社交网络类型相比,多样型社交网络类型与较低水平的抑郁症状相关,且心理韧性完全中介了这种关联。干预措施应帮助照料者维持与家人和朋友的社交网络。