Department of Psychology.
University of California.
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Dec;33(8):954-964. doi: 10.1037/fam0000561. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Research has generally shown the benefits of social support, such as the buffering effects on life stressors, yet there has been little empirical investigation of different types of support resources for transgender individuals. We examined family support, support from friends, and connectedness to a transgender community and how these forms of support come together to influence mental health and resilience. The sample included 695 transgender participants (mean age = 25.52 years, = 9.68, range = 16-73; 75.7% White) who completed an online survey. Greater than half of participants reported moderate to severe levels of anxious and depressive symptoms. Family social support had the strongest correlations with symptoms of anxiety and depression ( = -.31 and -.37, respectively, < .01) and was the only form of support associated with resilience when controlling for other forms of support. Latent profile analyses revealed 4 groups based on levels of social support from family and friends and community connectedness. Notably, Class 1 ( = 323; 47.1%) had high levels of support from family and friends and high levels of community connectedness. This class had lower levels of depression and anxiety symptoms and higher levels of resilience compared to other classes (Class 2, = 276, 40.3%, high friend/community, low family; Class 3, = 47, 6.9%, low support; Class 4, = 39, 5.7%, high family, low friend/community). This study highlights the importance of examining support from a more holistic approach and provides insight into unique associations between familial social support and resilience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
研究普遍表明,社会支持具有益处,例如可以缓冲生活应激源的影响,但对于跨性别个体的不同支持资源类型,实证研究却很少。我们研究了家庭支持、朋友支持以及与跨性别社区的联系,以及这些支持形式如何共同影响心理健康和韧性。该样本包括 695 名跨性别参与者(平均年龄 25.52 岁,标准差 = 9.68,范围 16-73;75.7%为白人),他们完成了一项在线调查。超过一半的参与者报告有中度至重度的焦虑和抑郁症状。家庭社会支持与焦虑和抑郁症状的相关性最强(分别为 -.31 和 -.37,均 <.01),并且在控制其他支持形式后,是唯一与韧性相关的支持形式。潜在剖面分析根据家庭和朋友以及社区联系的社会支持水平显示出 4 个群体。值得注意的是,第 1 类( = 323;47.1%)具有来自家庭和朋友的高水平支持和高水平社区联系。与其他类别相比,该类别具有较低的抑郁和焦虑症状水平,以及较高的韧性水平(第 2 类, = 276,40.3%,高朋友/社区,低家庭;第 3 类, = 47,6.9%,低支持;第 4 类, = 39,5.7%,高家庭,低朋友/社区)。这项研究强调了从更全面的方法来检验支持的重要性,并提供了关于家庭社会支持与韧性之间独特关联的深入了解。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。