Pang Karl H, Fallara Giuseppe, Hemat Morwarid, Ghosh Akash, Haider Aiman, Freeman Alex, Hadway Paul, Nigam Raj, Rees Rowland, Mitra Anita, Alifrangis Constantine, Muneer Asif, Alnajjar Hussain M
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Division of Urology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, HK, Hong Kong.
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Feb 29. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00842-5.
Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the oncological outcomes in younger men are unclear. We aimed to analyse and compare oncological outcomes of men age ≤50 years (y) and >50 years with PeCa. A retrospective analysis of men ≤50 y with penile squamous cell carcinoma managed at a tertiary centre was performed. A propensity score matched cohort of men >50 y was identified for comparison. Matching was according to tumour, nodal stage and the types of primary surgery. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survivals (MFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and compared using log-rank tests. Between 2005-2020, 100 men ≤50 y (median (IQR) age, 46 y (40-49)) were identified and matched with 100 men >50 y (median (IQR) age, 65 y (59-73)). 10, 24, 32, 34 men age ≤50 y were diagnosed in 2005-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2016 and 2017-2020 respectively. Median (IQR) follow-up was 53.5 (18-96) months. OS at 2 years: ≤50 y, 86%>50 y, 80.6%; 5 years: ≤50 y, 78.1%, >50 y, 63.1%; 10 years: ≤50 y, 72.3%, >50 y, 45.6% (p = 0.01). DSS at 2 years: ≤50 y, 87.2%>50 y, 87.8%; 5 years: ≤50 y, 80.9%>50 y, 78.2%; 10 years: ≤50 y, 78%, >50 y, 70.9% (p = 0.74). RFS was 93.1% in the ≤50 y group (vs. >50 y, 96.5%) at 2 year, and 90% (vs. >50 y, 88.5%) at 5 years, p = 0.81. Within the ≤50 y group, 2 years and 5 years MFS was 93% (vs. >50 y, 96.5%), and 89.5% (vs. >50 y, 92.7%) respectively, (p = 0.40). There were no statistical significance in DFS, RFS and MFS in men age ≤50 y and >50 y. PeCa in younger patients is fatal, public awareness and patient education are crucial for early detection and management.
阴茎癌(PeCa)较为罕见,年轻男性患者的肿瘤学预后尚不清楚。我们旨在分析和比较年龄≤50岁及>50岁的阴茎癌男性患者的肿瘤学预后。对在一家三级中心接受治疗的年龄≤50岁的阴茎鳞状细胞癌男性患者进行了回顾性分析。确定了一个倾向评分匹配的>50岁男性队列进行比较。匹配依据肿瘤、淋巴结分期和原发手术类型。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和无转移生存期(MFS),并使用对数秩检验进行比较。2005年至2020年期间,确定了100名年龄≤50岁(中位(四分位间距)年龄,46岁(40 - 49岁))的男性,并与100名>50岁(中位(四分位间距)年龄,65岁(59 - 73岁))的男性进行匹配。2005 - 2007年、2008 - 2012年、2013 - 2016年和2017 - 2020年分别诊断出10名、24名、32名、34名年龄≤50岁的男性。中位(四分位间距)随访时间为53.5(18 - 96)个月。2年时的OS:≤50岁组为86%,>50岁组为80.6%;5年时:≤50岁组为78.1%,>50岁组为63.1%;10年时:≤50岁组为72.3%,>50岁组为45.6%(p = 0.01)。2年时的DSS:≤50岁组为87.2%,>50岁组为87.8%;5年时:≤50岁组为80.9%,>50岁组为78.2%;10年时:≤50岁组为78%,>50岁组为70.9%(p = 0.74)。2年时RFS在≤50岁组为93.1%(对比>50岁组为96.5%),5年时为90%(对比>50岁组为88.5%),p = 0.81。在≤50岁组中,2年和5年的MFS分别为93%(对比>50岁组为96.5%)和89.5%(对比>50岁组为92.7%),(p = 0.40)。年龄≤50岁和>50岁男性的DFS、RFS和MFS无统计学差异。年轻患者的阴茎癌具有致命性,公众意识和患者教育对于早期发现和治疗至关重要。