• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴茎癌保器官整形重建术后的肿瘤学和功能结果。

Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Organ-Sparing Plastic Reconstructive Surgery for Penile Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Urology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia.

Division of Urology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Urology. 2020 Aug;142:161-165.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058. Epub 2020 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058
PMID:32380155
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe oncological and functional outcomes in patients treated with reconstructive organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Plastic reconstructive OSS of the penis with a split thickness skin graft has been proposed as a treatment option for penile cancer, with the objective being preservation of physiological voiding and sexual function without comprising oncological control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicenter study reporting clinicopathological data of 57 patients with malignant lesions of the penis treated with OSS and plastic reconstructive surgery with split thickness skin graft from 2007 to 2019. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with EuroQoL-5D-3L, urinary symptoms with the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, and erectile function with the International Index of erectile function (IIEF)-5.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent OSS reconstructive surgery. Twenty underwent glans resurfacing, 23 partial penectomy, and 14 glansectomy. Median age was 55.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29-90), median follow-up 55.7 months (3-149). At the time of data analysis, 6 patients had died of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) (12.5%) and 10 (17.8%) had progressed. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a 5-year survival rate of 87.5% and a 5-year progression-free survival of 83%. We assessed HRQoL and functional outcomes in 32 patients. EuroQol 5D-3L showed a mean health status of 82.5%, median Voiding score of the ICIQ-MLTUS was 4 (IQR 1-15), and median IIEF-5 19 (IQR 10.75-25).

CONCLUSION

OSS of the penis remains a safe and viable option for the treatment of SCC, ensuring a favorable appearance of the penis, preserving urinary and sexual function, with good HRQoL and without comprising oncological safety in selected cases.

摘要

目的

描述接受阴茎鳞癌保器官重建手术(OSS)治疗的患者的肿瘤学和功能结局。阴茎癌的治疗选择之一是采用带蒂皮瓣的整形外科 OSS,其目标是在不影响肿瘤控制的情况下,保持生理排尿和性功能。

材料和方法

这是一项多中心研究,报告了 2007 年至 2019 年间,57 例接受 OSS 和带蒂皮瓣整形重建手术治疗的阴茎恶性病变患者的临床病理数据。采用欧洲生命质量五维量表(EuroQoL-5D-3L)评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),采用国际下尿路症状咨询问卷-男性下尿路症状模块(ICIQ-MLUTS)评估尿症状,采用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)评估勃起功能。

结果

57 例患者接受了 OSS 重建手术。20 例行龟头再造术,23 例行部分阴茎切除术,14 例行阴茎部分切除术。中位年龄为 55.1 岁(四分位间距[IQR]29-90),中位随访时间为 55.7 个月(3-149)。在数据分析时,6 例患者死于鳞状细胞癌(SCC)(12.5%),10 例(17.8%)进展。Kaplan-Meier 估计显示 5 年生存率为 87.5%,5 年无进展生存率为 83%。我们评估了 32 例患者的 HRQoL 和功能结局。欧洲生命质量五维量表(EuroQoL-5D-3L)显示平均健康状况为 82.5%,国际尿失禁咨询问卷-男性下尿路症状模块(ICIQ-MLUTS)的平均排尿评分中位数为 4(IQR 1-15),国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)中位数为 19(IQR 10.75-25)。

结论

对于 SCC 的治疗,阴茎 OSS 仍然是一种安全可行的选择,能够确保阴茎外观良好,保持尿和性功能,同时具有良好的 HRQoL,并且在选定病例中不影响肿瘤安全性。

相似文献

1
Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Organ-Sparing Plastic Reconstructive Surgery for Penile Cancer.阴茎癌保器官整形重建术后的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Urology. 2020 Aug;142:161-165.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Localized disease: types of reconstruction/plastic surgery techniques after glans resurfacing/glansectomy/partial/total penectomy.局限性疾病:龟头表面重建/龟头切除术/部分/全部阴茎切除术的整形/修复手术技术类型。
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):213-217. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000711.
3
Organ-sparing reconstructive surgery in penile cancer: initial experiences at two Swedish referral centres.阴茎癌的保留器官重建手术:瑞典两家转诊中心的初步经验。
Scand J Urol. 2015 Apr;49(2):149-54. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.955822. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
4
Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort.阴茎癌保阴茎手术:一项多中心国际回顾性队列研究。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1233-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.045. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
5
Advances in Penile-Preserving Surgical Approaches in the Management of Penile Tumors.阴茎肿瘤治疗中保留阴茎手术方法的进展
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Nov;43(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
A Comparative study of two types of organ-sparing surgeries for early stage penile cancer: Wide local excision vs partial penectomy.两种早期阴茎癌保器官手术的对比研究:广泛局部切除术与部分阴茎切除术。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1425-1431. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
A Prospective Study of Total Glans Resurfacing for Localized Penile Cancer to Maximize Oncologic and Functional Outcomes in a Tertiary Referral Network.一项针对局限性阴茎癌行全龟头表面切除术以最大化肿瘤学和功能结局的前瞻性研究,该研究在一个三级转诊网络中进行。
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1258-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.089. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
8
Inverted urethral flap reconstruction after partial penectomy: Long-term oncological and functional outcomes.阴茎部分切除术后倒置尿道皮瓣重建术:长期肿瘤学和功能结局
Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(4):169.e13-169.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
9
Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.阴茎癌的保阴茎和重建手术治疗。
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 May;13(5):249-57. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.54. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life following penile cancer surgery: a comprehensive review.阴茎癌手术后的功能结果和健康相关生活质量:全面综述。
Sex Med Rev. 2023 Sep 27;11(4):441-459. doi: 10.1093/sxmrev/qead021.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures in penile cancer: a narrative review.阴茎癌患者报告的结局指标:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01031-8.
2
Penile cancer treatment and sexuality: a narrative review.阴茎癌的治疗与性功能:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01095-6.
3
Sexual functioning after penile cancer surgery: comparison between surgical approaches in a large patient cohort.阴茎癌手术后的性功能:大型患者队列中手术方法的比较
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01063-0.
4
Functional outcomes of glansectomy to treat localised penile cancer: a systematic review.阴茎部分切除术治疗局限性阴茎癌的功能结局:一项系统评价
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01062-1.
5
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessments in Research on Patients with Adult Rare Solid Cancers: A State-of-the-Art Review.成人罕见实体癌患者研究中的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)评估:最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;17(3):387. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030387.
6
Follow Up Care After Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: Current Perspectives.阴茎癌保留阴茎手术后的随访护理:当前观点
Res Rep Urol. 2024 Oct 2;16:225-233. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S465546. eCollection 2024.
7
Functional outcomes of organ sparing surgery for penile cancer confined to glans and premalignant lesions.局限于龟头的阴茎癌及癌前病变保器官手术的功能结局
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00967-7.
8
Improving Quality of Life and Psychosocial Health for Penile Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review.提高阴茎癌幸存者的生活质量和心理社会健康:一项叙述性综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;16(7):1309. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071309.
9
Long-term outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men age ≤50 years old compared with men >50 years old from a single tertiary referral centre: a propensity score matched analysis.来自单一三级转诊中心的年龄≤50岁男性与>50岁男性阴茎鳞状细胞癌的长期结局:倾向评分匹配分析
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Feb 29. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00842-5.
10
Sexual Outcomes after Conservative Management for Patients with Localized Penile Cancer.局限性阴茎癌保守治疗后的性结局。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Dec 17;30(12):10501-10508. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120765.