Aminololama-Shakeri Shadi, Soo Mary Scott, Grimm Lars J, Destounis Stamatia
University of California Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento, CA.
Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC.
J Breast Imaging. 2019 Jun 4;1(2):109-114. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbz019.
To assess breast imaging radiologists' perceptions of the adequacy of provider-patient discussions regarding the benefits and risks of screening mammography and supplemental screening in women with elevated risk and dense breasts.
A 36-item questionnaire developed by the Society of Breast Imaging Patient Care and Delivery Task Force was distributed electronically to Society of Breast Imaging members to evaluate patient communication, education, and screening practices. Data from the 11 items specifically pertaining to screening practices were analyzed.
The response rate was 14% (275/1992). Seventy-four percent of survey respondents perceived provider-patient discussions regarding mammography screening guidelines as inadequate, and they agreed that provider-patient discussions regarding screening guidelines (82%) and supplemental screening for increased breast density (74%) should be standardized. Only 38% indicated that mammography screening guidelines are officially endorsed by their institution. Similarly, 37% reported that recommendations were up to the primary provider. Although most respondents include information about breast density in lay letters (73%) and radiology reports (89%), many feel that further patient education regarding breast density, supplemental screening, risk assessment, and screening guidelines should be performed by radiologists, and they are willing to provide additional patient education in these areas in practice.
Survey respondents perceived current provider-patient discussions about the risks and benefits of breast cancer mammography screening and supplemental screening as inadequate and felt that standards should be developed. Respondents reported a willingness to take on patient education as part of their daily practice. These findings could inform future initiatives for radiologists to contribute to enhancing provider-patient education.
评估乳腺影像放射科医生对于医患之间就乳腺钼靶筛查以及高危和乳腺致密女性补充筛查的获益与风险讨论充分性的看法。
由乳腺影像学会患者护理与服务任务组编制的一份包含36个条目的问卷通过电子方式分发给乳腺影像学会成员,以评估患者沟通、教育及筛查实践情况。对专门涉及筛查实践的11个条目的数据进行了分析。
回复率为14%(275/1992)。74%的调查受访者认为医患之间关于钼靶筛查指南的讨论不充分,并且他们一致认为关于筛查指南(82%)以及针对乳腺密度增加的补充筛查(74%)的医患讨论应该标准化。只有38%的人表示其所在机构正式认可钼靶筛查指南。同样,37%的人报告称建议由初级医疗服务提供者决定。尽管大多数受访者在通俗易懂的信件(73%)和放射学报告(89%)中纳入了有关乳腺密度的信息,但许多人认为放射科医生应该针对乳腺密度、补充筛查、风险评估和筛查指南对患者进行进一步教育,并且他们愿意在实际工作中就这些领域为患者提供额外教育。
调查受访者认为当前医患之间关于乳腺癌钼靶筛查及补充筛查的风险和获益讨论不充分,并认为应该制定标准。受访者报告愿意将患者教育作为日常工作的一部分。这些发现可为放射科医生未来促进医患教育的举措提供参考。