Allam Omar, Dinis Jacob, Almeida Mariana N, Junn Alexandra, Mozaffari Mohammad Ali, Shah Rema, Chong Lauren, Olawoyin Olamide, Mehta Sumarth, Park Kitae Eric, Avraham Tomer, Alperovich Michael
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):42-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775592. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Increasing concerns regarding the safety of textured surface implants have resulted in surgeons transitioning from textured tissue expanders (TEs) to smooth TEs. Given this change has only recently occurred, this study evaluated outcomes between smooth and textured TEs. Women who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction using TEs from 2013 to 2022 were included. TE-specific variables, perioperative information, pain scores, and complications were collected. Chi-squared, -test, and linear regression analyses were performed. A total of 320 patients received a total of 384 textured and 152 smooth TEs. Note that 216 patients received bilateral reconstruction. TEs were removed in 9 cases. No significant differences existed between groups regarding comorbidities. Smooth TEs had a higher proportion of prepectoral placement ( < 0.001). Smooth TEs had less fills (3 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 2, < 0.001), shorter expansion periods (60 ± 44 vs. 90 ± 77 days, < 0.001), smaller expander fill volumes (390 ± 168 vs. 478 ± 177 mL, < 0.001), and shorter time to exchange (80 ± 43 vs. 104 ± 39 days, < 0.001). Complication rates between textured and smooth TEs were comparable. Smooth TE had a greater proportion of TE replacements ( = 0.030). On regression analysis, pain scores were more closely associated with age ( = 0.018) and TE texture ( = 0.046). Additional procedures at time of TE exchange ( < 0.001) and textured TE ( = 0.017) led to longer operative times. As many surgeons have transitioned away from textured implants, our study shows that smooth TEs have similar outcomes to the textured alternatives.
对带纹理表面植入物安全性的担忧日益增加,导致外科医生从带纹理的组织扩张器(TE)转向光滑的TE。鉴于这种变化最近才发生,本研究评估了光滑TE和带纹理TE的治疗效果。纳入了2013年至2022年期间使用TE进行两阶段乳房重建的女性。收集了TE特异性变量、围手术期信息、疼痛评分和并发症。进行了卡方检验、t检验和线性回归分析。共有320例患者接受了384个带纹理TE和152个光滑TE。注意,216例患者接受了双侧重建。9例患者的TE被取出。两组之间在合并症方面没有显著差异。光滑TE在前胸肌放置的比例更高(P<0.001)。光滑TE的填充次数更少(3±1次对4±2次,P<0.001),扩张期更短(60±44天对90±77天,P<0.001),扩张器填充量更小(390±168毫升对478±177毫升,P<0.001),更换时间更短(80±43天对104±39天,P<0.001)。带纹理TE和光滑TE之间的并发症发生率相当。光滑TE的TE更换比例更高(P = 0.030)。回归分析显示,疼痛评分与年龄(P = 0.018)和TE纹理(P = 0.046)的相关性更强。TE更换时的额外手术(P<0.001)和带纹理TE(P = 0.017)导致手术时间更长。由于许多外科医生已不再使用带纹理的植入物,我们的研究表明,光滑TE的治疗效果与带纹理的替代品相似。