• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光滑表面组织扩张器乳房重建的安全性和有效性。

Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

机构信息

Resident, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Attending Plastic Surgeon.

出版信息

Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Jan 1;40(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy199.

DOI:10.1093/asj/sjy199
PMID:30107477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7317085/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional 2-stage breast reconstruction involves placement of a textured-surface tissue expander (TTE). Recent studies have demonstrated textured surface devices have higher propensity for bacterial contamination and biofilm formation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of smooth surface tissue expanders (STE) in immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive women who underwent STE breast reconstruction from 2016 to 2017 at 3 institutions. Indications and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total 112 patients underwent STE reconstruction (75 subpectoral, 37 prepectoral placement), receiving 173 devices and monitored for a mean follow-up of 14.1 months. Demographics of patients included average age of 53 years and average BMI of 27.2 kg/m2, and 18.6% received postmastectomy radiation therapy. Overall complication rates were 15.6% and included mastectomy skin flap necrosis (10.4%), seroma (5.2%), expander malposition (2.9%), and infection requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy (3.5%). Six (3.5%) unplanned reoperations with explantation were reported for 3 infections and 3 patients requesting change of plan with no reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

STEs represent a safe and efficacious alternative to TTE breast reconstruction with at least equitable outcomes. Technique modification including tab fixation, strict pocket control, postoperative bra support, and suture choice may contribute to observed favorable outcomes and are reviewed. Early results for infection control and explantation rate are encouraging and warrant comparative evaluation for potential superiority over TTEs in a prospective randomized trial.

摘要

背景

传统的两阶段乳房重建术涉及使用表面纹理的组织扩张器(TTE)。最近的研究表明,表面纹理装置更容易受到细菌污染和生物膜形成的影响。

目的

本研究旨在评估在即刻乳房重建中使用光滑表面组织扩张器(STE)的安全性和有效性。

方法

作者回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2017 年在 3 家机构接受 STE 乳房重建的连续女性患者。评估了适应证和结果。

结果

共 112 例患者接受了 STE 重建(75 例胸肌下,37 例胸肌前),共植入 173 个装置,平均随访 14.1 个月。患者的人口统计学特征包括平均年龄为 53 岁,平均 BMI 为 27.2kg/m2,18.6%接受了乳腺癌根治术后放疗。总体并发症发生率为 15.6%,包括乳房切除术皮瓣坏死(10.4%)、血清肿(5.2%)、扩张器位置不当(2.9%)和需要静脉抗生素治疗的感染(3.5%)。报告了 6 例(3.5%)计划外的再手术,其中 3 例为感染,3 例为要求改变计划但不进行重建的患者。

结论

STE 是 TTE 乳房重建的一种安全有效的替代方法,其结果至少相当。技术改良,包括钉固定、严格的口袋控制、术后胸罩支撑和缝线选择,可能有助于观察到良好的结果,并进行了回顾。感染控制和取出率的早期结果令人鼓舞,值得在前瞻性随机试验中对其潜在优于 TTE 的效果进行比较评估。

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Smooth Surface Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.光滑表面组织扩张器乳房重建的安全性和有效性。
Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Jan 1;40(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy199.
2
Judging an Expander by Its Cover: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Impact of Tissue Expander Surface Texture on First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.从外观判断扩张器:组织扩张器表面纹理对一期乳房重建结果影响的倾向评分匹配分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):1e-6e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007417.
3
Impact of Tissue Expander Surface Texture on Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes: A Combined Analysis.组织扩张器表面纹理对二期乳房重建结果的影响:联合分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jun 1;153(6):1053e-1062e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010763. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.平滑与粗糙组织扩张器在乳房重建中的并发症谱:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Mar 15;44(4):383-393. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad319.
5
Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes.胸大肌前与胸大肌下组织扩张器乳房重建:一项历史对照、倾向评分匹配的围手术期结局比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008013.
6
Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.光滑型与粗糙型扩张器:患者因素和解剖平面是决定一期乳房重建效果的更大因素。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Jan 16;44(2):NP159-NP167. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad303.
7
Textured versus Smooth Tissue Expanders: A Comparison of Complications in 3526 Breast Reconstructions.纹理与光滑组织扩张器:3526 例乳房重建并发症比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):262e-272e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010600. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Prepectoral Smooth Versus Textured Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.经胸肌前平滑与粗糙组织扩张器乳房重建术的围手术期结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 May 1;90(5S Suppl 3):S242-S251. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003397.
9
Outcomes Analysis of Textured Versus Smooth Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction.乳房重建中带纹理与光滑组织扩张器的疗效分析。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 1;89(6):622-625. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003330.
10
Air versus Saline in Initial Prepectoral Tissue Expansion: A Comparison of Complications and Perioperative Patient-Reported Outcomes.经胸预置扩张中空气与盐水的比较:并发症和围手术期患者报告结局的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Oct 1;152(4S):25S-34S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010478. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Smooth Operator: Nanotextured Breast Tissue Expanders Are Associated with Lower Rates of Capsular Contracture.平滑操作者:纳米纹理化乳房组织扩张器与较低的包膜挛缩发生率相关。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 28;13(19):5803. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195803.
2
Acute and chronic mammary periprosthetic histological changes of the muscle.肌肉的急性和慢性乳房假体周围组织学变化
JPRAS Open. 2024 Jul 5;41:265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.010. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Smooth versus Textured Tissue Expanders: Comparison of Outcomes and Complications in 536 Implants.光滑型与纹理型组织扩张器:536例植入物的效果及并发症比较
Arch Plast Surg. 2024 Feb 7;51(1):42-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775592. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
The Impact of Nasal Staphylococcus aureus Carriage on Surgical-Site Infections after Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Risk Factors and Biofilm Formation Potential.鼻腔金黄色葡萄球菌定植对即刻乳房重建术后手术部位感染的影响:危险因素和生物膜形成潜力。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 13;29:e940898. doi: 10.12659/MSM.940898.
5
Textured versus Smooth Tissue Expanders: A Comparison of Complications in 3526 Breast Reconstructions.纹理与光滑组织扩张器:3526 例乳房重建并发症比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):262e-272e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010600. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Is It All about Surface Topography? An Intra-Individual Clinical Outcome Analysis of Two Different Implant Surfaces in Breast Reconstruction.一切都与表面形貌有关吗?乳房重建中两种不同种植体表面的个体内临床结果分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):1315. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041315.
7
Advances in Tissue Expander Technology Enable Early Targeted Intervention in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.组织扩张器技术的进展使胸前区乳房重建能够进行早期靶向干预。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e3781. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003781. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Accidental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation of Carbon Dioxide Tissue Expanders.二氧化碳组织扩张器的意外磁共振成像激活
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2020 Jun 9;2(2):ojaa025. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaa025. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Safety of CPX4 Breast Tissue Expanders in Primary Reconstruction Patients.CPX4乳房组织扩张器在一期重建患者中的安全性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):e3425. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003425. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction.基于扩张器的乳房重建中设备创新对临床结果的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Dec 24;7(12):e2524. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002524. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Textured Breast Implants: A Closer Look at the Surface Debris Under the Microscope.纹理乳房植入物:在显微镜下仔细观察表面碎片
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2017 Aug;25(3):179-183. doi: 10.1177/2292550317716127. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
2
Tissue expansion for breast reconstruction: Methods and techniques.用于乳房重建的组织扩张术:方法与技术。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 21;21:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.048. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Complications in tissue expansion: A logistic regression analysis for risk factors.组织扩张术中的并发症:危险因素的逻辑回归分析
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.030. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Prediction of Skin Necrosis after Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Using Indocyanine Green Angiography Imaging.使用吲哚菁绿血管造影成像预测乳腺癌乳房切除术后的皮肤坏死
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Apr 21;5(4):e1321. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001321. eCollection 2017 Apr.
5
Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.乳房重建中异形与圆形植入物:手术及患者报告结局的多机构比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003238.
6
Infectious Loss of Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: Are We Treating the Right Organisms?乳房重建中组织扩张器的感染性损失:我们是否在治疗正确的病原体?
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;78(2):149-152. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000847.
7
Salvaging the Infected Breast Tissue Expander: A Standardized Multidisciplinary Approach.挽救感染的乳房组织扩张器:一种标准化的多学科方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jun 10;4(6):e732. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000676. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery.用于乳房重建手术的不同类型植入物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2.
9
Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.假体乳房重建当前设备的进展与更新
Gland Surg. 2015 Apr;4(2):97-110. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.03.09.
10
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Survey of Current Practice among Plastic Surgeons.乳房重建手术中的脱细胞真皮基质:整形外科医生当前实践调查
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 May 7;3(4):e381. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000148. eCollection 2015 Apr.