• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A Modified Dynamic Fixation Technique for Acute Syndesmotic Injuries.

作者信息

Bouaicha Walid, Jlidi Mohamed, Sbaihi Siwar, Gharbi Mohamed Hedi, Mallek Karim, Jaziri Salma, Daas Selim

机构信息

Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Mohamed Taher Maamouri Hospital, Nabeul, Tunisia.

Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Feb 28;9(1):24730114241232979. doi: 10.1177/24730114241232979. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1177/24730114241232979
PMID:38426008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10903226/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556c/10903226/fc6c81a04a09/10.1177_24730114241232979-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556c/10903226/2c824ef93a44/10.1177_24730114241232979-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556c/10903226/fc6c81a04a09/10.1177_24730114241232979-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556c/10903226/2c824ef93a44/10.1177_24730114241232979-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/556c/10903226/fc6c81a04a09/10.1177_24730114241232979-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Modified Dynamic Fixation Technique for Acute Syndesmotic Injuries.一种用于急性下胫腓联合损伤的改良动态固定技术。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Feb 28;9(1):24730114241232979. doi: 10.1177/24730114241232979. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
The Clinical Efficacy of Suture-Button Fixation and Trans-Syndesmotic Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Ankle Fracture Combined With Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury: A Retrospective Study.缝线纽扣固定与经联合钉固定治疗合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折的临床疗效：一项回顾性研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jan-Feb;61(1):143-148. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
Changes in the Syndesmotic Reduction After Syndesmotic Suture-Button Fixation for Ankle Malleolar Fractures: 1-Year Longitudinal Evaluations Using Computed Tomography.下胫腓联合螺钉固定术后下胫腓联合复位变化的 1 年纵向 CT 评估：踝关节骨折
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Oct;42(10):1270-1276. doi: 10.1177/10711007211008518. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries.下胫腓联合损伤中缝线纽扣与螺钉固定技术复位准确性的评估
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Dec;37(12):1317-1325. doi: 10.1177/1071100716661221. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Arthroscopically measured syndesmotic stability after screw vs. suture button fixation in a cadaveric model.在尸体模型中，对比螺钉与缝线纽扣固定后关节镜测量下的下胫腓联合稳定性。
Injury. 2017 Nov;48(11):2433-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.066. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.关于伴有下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折治疗的系统评价与Meta分析：缝线纽扣固定与皮质骨螺钉固定的比较
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):946-953. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.006.
7
Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Syndesmotic Plate Compared With Traditional Screw and Suture Button Fixation.新型下胫腓联合板与传统螺钉和缝线纽扣固定的生物力学分析。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 May-Jun;59(3):522-528. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Suture Button Fixation Versus Syndesmotic Screws in Supination-External Rotation Type 4 Injuries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.旋后-外旋IV型损伤中缝线纽扣固定与下胫腓螺钉固定的成本效益分析
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):210-217. doi: 10.1177/0363546516664713. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
A systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.缝线纽扣与下胫腓螺钉治疗下胫腓联合损伤的系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 4;18(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1645-7.
10
Medial Structure Injury During Suture Button Insertion Using the Center-Center Technique for Syndesmotic Stabilization.采用中央对中央技术缝合纽扣置入治疗下胫腓联合固定时的中间结构损伤。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Aug;39(8):984-989. doi: 10.1177/1071100718770200. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Corrigendum to "Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions" [Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 105 (8S) (2019) S275-S286].
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Apr;108(2):103237. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103237. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Static versus dynamic fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.静态与动态固定下胫腓联合：重叠荟萃分析的系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3534-3542. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06721-6. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
3
Comparison of suture button fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.缝合钉固定与下胫腓联合螺钉固定治疗下胫腓联合损伤的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
4
Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair.急性下胫腓联合损伤：缝线纽扣与下胫腓联合螺钉修复的系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
5
Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification.踝关节联合损伤的钢丝固定：临床结果、并发症和技术改良。
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison.下胫腓联合损伤模型中缝线纽扣与螺钉固定的生物力学比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Apr;30(4):346-52. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0346.
7
Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention.踝关节下胫腓联合损伤：解剖学、生物力学、损伤机制以及诊断与干预的临床指南
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;36(6):372-84. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2195.