Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, 100 W 18th Ave, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, 1060 Carmack Rd, Columbus, Ohio 43210, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Anal Chem. 2024 Mar 12;96(10):4251-4258. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05725. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
Three-dimensional (3D) organoids have been at the forefront of regenerative medicine and cancer biology fields for the past decade. However, the fragile nature of organoids makes their spatial analysis challenging due to their budding structures and composition of single layer of cells. The standard sample preparation approaches can collapse the organoid morphology. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated several approaches to optimize a method compatible with both mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) and immunohistological techniques. Murine intestinal organoids were used to evaluate embedding in gelatin, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-gelatin-CMC-sucrose, or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solutions. Organoids were assessed with and without aldehyde fixation and analyzed for lipid distributions by MSI coupled with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunofluorescence (IF) in consecutive sections from the same sample. While chemical fixation preserves morphology for better histological outcomes, it can lead to suppression of the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) lipid signal. By contrast, leaving organoid samples unfixed enhanced MALDI lipid signal. The method that performed best for both MALDI and histological analysis was embedding unfixed samples in HPMC and PVP. This approach allowed assessment of cell proliferation by Ki67 while also identifying putative phosphatidylethanolamine (PE(18:0/18:1)), which was confirmed further by tandem MS approaches. Overall, these protocols will be amenable to multiplexing imaging mass spectrometry analysis with several histological assessments and help advance our understanding of the biological processes that take place in district subsets of cells in budding organoid structures.
三维(3D)类器官在过去十年一直处于再生医学和癌症生物学领域的前沿。然而,由于类器官的萌芽结构和单层细胞组成,其空间分析具有挑战性。标准的样本制备方法会破坏类器官的形态。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了几种方法,以优化一种兼容质谱成像(MSI)和免疫组织化学技术的方法。使用小鼠肠类器官来评估明胶、羧甲基纤维素(CMC)-明胶-CMC-蔗糖或羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮(PVP)溶液中的包埋方法。评估了醛固定和未固定的类器官,并通过 MSI 结合苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色以及来自同一样本的连续切片中的免疫荧光(IF)分析脂质分布。虽然化学固定可以更好地保存形态学以获得更好的组织学结果,但它可能会抑制基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALDI)脂质信号。相比之下,不固定类器官样品可以增强 MALDI 脂质信号。对于 MALDI 和组织学分析表现最好的方法是将未固定的样品嵌入 HPMC 和 PVP 中。这种方法允许通过 Ki67 评估细胞增殖,同时还可以识别可能的磷脂酰乙醇胺(PE(18:0/18:1)),通过串联 MS 方法进一步证实了这一点。总的来说,这些方案将适合与几种组织学评估相结合进行多重成像质谱分析,并有助于我们深入了解发生在萌芽类器官结构中细胞亚群中的生物学过程。