Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101860. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101860. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
Recanalization of target veins after treatment of superficial venous incompetence has clinical implications and may depend on the type of intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and procedural factors associated with truncal vein recanalization in a large study cohort using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Varicose Vein Registry.
We performed a retrospective review using the VQI Varicose Vein Registry from 2014 to 2018. We evaluated all procedures performed for truncal venous insufficiency. Demographic data and information about treatment modality were collected. Patients were separated into recanalization and nonrecanalization groups based on the status of the treated vein at follow-up ultrasound examination. The vein was only considered recanalized if the VQI noted complete recanalization of the target vein. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were performed as appropriate.
A total of 10,604 procedures were performed in 7403 patients. The average age was 55.9 years and 70.3% of the patients were female. Patients with recanalization were more likely to have a history of phlebitis (P < .001) and had a higher mean body mass index (30.5 vs 32., kg/m ; P = .006) compared with those without recanalization. There was no difference in the use of compression therapy, anticoagulation, deep venous reflux, number of pregnancies, prior deep vein thrombosis, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology between patients with and without recanalization. The number of truncal veins treated per procedure was higher in the recanalization group compared with the nonrecanalization group (2.36 vs 1.88; P = .001). After multivariate logistic regression, laser ablation was associated with higher rate of recanalization compared with radiofrequency ablation (P = .017).
This study is the first to use VQI based data to describe risk factors for recanalization following treatment of truncal venous reflux. The use of laser ablation for truncal veins is associated with a higher risk for recanalization compared with radiofrequency ablation. Obesity, prior phlebitis, and number of veins treated were independently associated with increased rate of recanalization.
治疗浅静脉功能不全后靶静脉再通具有临床意义,且可能取决于干预方式。本研究旨在利用血管质量倡议(VQI)静脉曲张登记处,在一个大型研究队列中评估与主干静脉再通相关的患者和手术因素。
我们使用 VQI 静脉曲张登记处,回顾性分析了 2014 年至 2018 年期间的所有主干静脉功能不全治疗手术。收集了人口统计学数据和治疗方式信息。根据随访超声检查中治疗静脉的状态,将患者分为再通组和未再通组。仅当 VQI 记录到目标静脉完全再通时,才认为静脉再通。进行了单变量和多变量比较。
共对 7403 例患者的 10604 例手术进行了分析。患者的平均年龄为 55.9 岁,70.3%为女性。与未再通组相比,再通组更易发生静脉炎病史(P<.001),且平均体重指数更高(30.5 vs 32. kg/m2;P=0.006)。两组间使用压缩治疗、抗凝、深静脉反流、妊娠次数、既往深静脉血栓形成、静脉临床严重程度评分和临床病因解剖病理生理学并无差异。与未再通组相比,再通组每例手术治疗的主干静脉数量更高(2.36 比 1.88;P=0.001)。多变量逻辑回归后,与射频消融相比,激光消融与更高的再通率相关(P=0.017)。
这是第一项利用 VQI 数据描述主干静脉反流治疗后再通风险因素的研究。与射频消融相比,激光消融治疗主干静脉与再通率升高相关。肥胖、既往静脉炎和治疗静脉数量与再通率增加独立相关。