Center for Animal Resources and Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2024 May 1;63(3):325-332. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-23-000083. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
Many experiments require the collection of serial blood samples from mice. However, the size of mice limits the volume of blood that can be safely collected as a survival procedure. In IACUC protocols, investigators may report the amount of blood they collect from mice as a number of drops. Many institutions, including ours, use an anecdotal conversion factor (1drop of mouse blood = 25μL) to ensure that blood-collection volumes are compliant with institutional guidelines. To our knowledge, previous work has not experimentally determined the volume of a drop of mouse blood. In this 10-wk crossover experiment, 2 phlebotomists bled 30 C57BL/6J mice from 3 sites (facial, saphenous, and tail) using one or 2 different needle gauge sizes per site. Male and female mice were weighed weekly and divided among 5 groups (n = 6): left and right tail vein, left and right saphenous vein, and facial vein. A single blood drop from each site was weighed, and the volume of each drop was calculated using the average blood density determined from 8 mice terminally bled at the end of the study. Venipuncture site and side significantly influenced blood-drop weight and thus calculated volume. Facial vein puncture produced the largest drop volume (mean: 21.7μL), followed by the saphenous vein (mean: 9.97μL) and tail vein (mean: 4.96μL). Collection from the facial vein was associated with more hemorrhage and morbidity. Left-sided venipuncture was associated with slightly larger-volume blood drops, though the effect size of side was small. The results of this study may be useful in more accurately estimating blood loss via conversion of drops to volume. Our data indicate that blood collection from saphenous and tail veins minimizes blood loss relative to facial vein puncture and may optimize both serial collection of small-volume blood samples and animal welfare.
许多实验都需要从老鼠身上采集连续的血样。然而,老鼠的体型限制了作为生存程序可以安全采集的血量。在 IACUC 方案中,研究人员可能会报告他们从老鼠身上采集的血量,单位为滴数。包括我们在内的许多机构都使用一种经验转换因子(1 滴鼠血=25μL)来确保采血体积符合机构指南。据我们所知,之前的工作并没有实验确定一滴鼠血的体积。在这项为期 10 周的交叉实验中,2 名采血员使用 1 种或 2 种不同的针规大小从 3 个部位(面部、隐静脉和尾巴)采集 30 只 C57BL/6J 老鼠的血。雄性和雌性老鼠每周称重,并分为 5 组(n=6):左、右尾静脉,左、右隐静脉和面部静脉。从每个部位采集一滴血样,使用从研究结束时处死的 8 只老鼠确定的平均血液密度计算每滴血样的体积。采血部位和侧别显著影响血滴重量,从而影响计算体积。面部静脉穿刺产生的血滴体积最大(平均值:21.7μL),其次是隐静脉(平均值:9.97μL)和尾静脉(平均值:4.96μL)。面部静脉采血与更多的出血和发病率相关。左侧采血与稍大体积的血滴相关,但侧别效应较小。这项研究的结果可能有助于更准确地通过滴数换算体积来估计失血量。我们的数据表明,与面部静脉穿刺相比,从隐静脉和尾静脉采集血液可以最大限度地减少失血,并且可能优化小体积血液样本的连续采集和动物福利。