From the Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2024 Mar 1;49(2):E81-E86. doi: 10.1503/jpn.230137. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
All research needs ethical regulation, which is institutionalized in research ethics committees. The patient information sheet, approved by a research ethics committee, sets out what patients need to know to make an informed choice about research participation. However, guidance from research ethics committees is much less explicit about risk communication. In this commentary, the balance of risk in the patient information sheets from protocols of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medication reduction in psychosis was compared with numbers needed to treat and harm from the literature. The patient information sheet omitted risk of excess death and incomplete recovery following relapse, and overestimated the anticipated benefits. All of these risks were demonstrated in the published results of 1 of the 2 RCTs. Quantifying and tabulating risk might improve patient information sheets.
所有研究都需要伦理规范,这在研究伦理委员会中得到制度化。经过研究伦理委员会批准的患者知情同意书列出了患者需要了解的内容,以便他们能够对参与研究做出明智的选择。然而,研究伦理委员会的指导对于风险沟通的规定要少得多。在这篇评论中,我们比较了来自 2 项药物减少精神分裂症随机对照试验(RCT)方案的患者知情同意书中的风险平衡与文献中的需要治疗人数和危害。患者知情同意书忽略了复发后过度死亡和不完全康复的风险,并且高估了预期的获益。所有这些风险都在 2 项 RCT 中的 1 项发表结果中得到了证实。量化和制表风险可能会改进患者知情同意书。