Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of second-generation intra-cycle motion correction algorithm (SnapShot Freeze 2, GE Healthcare, MC2) in improving the delineation and interpretability of coronary arteries in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) compared to first-generation intra-cycle motion correction algorithm (SnapShot Freeze, GE Healthcare, MC1).
Fifty consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA on a 256-slice CT scanner were retrospectively studied. CCTA were reconstructed with three different algorithms: no motion correction (NMC), MC1, and MC2. The delineation of coronary arteries on CCTA was qualitatively rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (nondiagnostic) to 5 (excellent) by two radiologists blinded to the reconstruction method and the patient information.
On a per-vessel basis, the delineation scores of coronary arteries were significantly higher on MC2 images compared to MC1 images (median [interquartile range], right coronary artery, 5.0 [4.5-5.0] vs 4.5 [4.0-5.0]; left anterior descending artery, 5.0 [4.5-5.0] vs 4.5 [3.5-5.0]; left circumflex artery, 5.0 [4.5-5.0] vs 4.5 [3.9-5.0]; all p < 0.05). On a per-segment basis, for both 2 observers, the delineation scores on segment 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 on MC2 images were significantly better than those on MC1 images (p < 0.05). The percentage of interpretable segments (rated score 3 or greater) on NMC, MC1, and MC2 images was 90.5-91.9%, 97.4-97.9%, and 100.0%, respectively.
Second-generation intra-cycle motion correction algorithm improves the delineation and interpretability of coronary arteries in CCTA compared to first-generation algorithm.
本研究旨在探讨第二代周期内运动校正算法(SnapShot Freeze 2,GE Healthcare,MC2)在改善冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)中冠状动脉的勾画和可解读性方面的有效性,与第一代周期内运动校正算法(SnapShot Freeze,GE Healthcare,MC1)相比。
回顾性分析了 50 例经 256 层 CT 扫描仪行 CCTA 的已知或疑似冠状动脉疾病患者。CCTA 分别采用三种不同的重建算法进行重建:无运动校正(NMC)、MC1 和 MC2。两位放射科医师在不知道重建方法和患者信息的情况下,对 CCTA 上冠状动脉的勾画进行了 5 分制(1 分:不可诊断;5 分:极好)的定性评分。
以单支血管为基础,与 MC1 图像相比,MC2 图像上冠状动脉的勾画评分显著更高(中位数[四分位间距],右冠状动脉:5.0[4.5-5.0]比 4.5[4.0-5.0];左前降支:5.0[4.5-5.0]比 4.5[3.5-5.0];左回旋支:5.0[4.5-5.0]比 4.5[3.9-5.0];均 p<0.05)。以节段为基础,对于两位观察者,MC2 图像上节段 1、2、8、9、10、12 和 13 的勾画评分均显著优于 MC1 图像(p<0.05)。在 NMC、MC1 和 MC2 图像上,可解读节段(评分 3 分或更高)的百分比分别为 90.5%-91.9%、97.4%-97.9%和 100.0%。
与第一代算法相比,第二代周期内运动校正算法可改善 CCTA 中冠状动脉的勾画和可解读性。