Suppr超能文献

用梅毒螺旋体血凝试验对快速血浆反应素和酶联免疫吸附测定法检测献血者梅毒的比较评估:单中心经验

Comparative evaluation of rapid plasma reagin and ELISA with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay for the detection of syphilis in blood donors: a single center experience.

作者信息

Kakkar Brinda, Philip Joseph, Mallhi Rajeevinder Singh

机构信息

Bharati Vidyapeeth, Deemed to be University, Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Bharati Vidyapeeth, Deemed to be University, Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024 Nov;46 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S43-S47. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The prime responsibility of blood transfusion services in India is to provide safe blood. The donated blood is tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), malaria and syphilis. In India, the screening of donated blood for syphilis is performed by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL), whereas the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends screening of syphilis in blood donors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RPR and ELISA with the Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA - the gold standard) for the detection of syphilis in blood donors.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 1524 consecutive whole blood donors were screened from April to October 2022. All blood samples collected during the study period were tested by RPR, ELISA and the TPHA and the results obtained were compared.

RESULTS

The seroprevalence of syphilis in blood donors in this study was 0.06% by RPR and 0.72% by ELISA and TPHA. On considering ELISA and the TPHA as the gold standard, ELISA had comparable sensitivity (100%), a higher specificity (100% vs. 99.34%), a higher positive predictive value (PPV - 100% vs. 9.1%) and no biological false positive/false negative results (0 vs. 10 false negatives) when compared to RPR.

CONCLUSION

ELISA performed better as a screening assay than RPR in the detection of syphilis in blood donors, which is in agreement with the WHO recommendations for syphilis testing in blood donors with low prevalence.

摘要

引言

印度输血服务的主要职责是提供安全血液。对捐献的血液进行人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)、疟疾和梅毒检测。在印度,通过快速血浆反应素试验(RPR)或性病研究实验室试验(VDRL)对捐献血液进行梅毒筛查,而世界卫生组织(WHO)建议采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)对献血者进行梅毒筛查。因此,本研究的目的是评估RPR和ELISA与梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA——金标准)在检测献血者梅毒方面的性能。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,于2022年4月至10月对1524名连续的全血献血者进行了筛查。对研究期间采集的所有血液样本进行RPR、ELISA和TPHA检测,并比较所得结果。

结果

本研究中献血者梅毒的血清阳性率通过RPR为0.06%,通过ELISA和TPHA为0.72%。将ELISA和TPHA视为金标准时,与RPR相比,ELISA具有相当的敏感性(100%)、更高的特异性(100%对99.34%)、更高的阳性预测值(PPV——100%对9.1%)且无生物学假阳性/假阴性结果(0对10例假阴性)。

结论

在检测献血者梅毒方面,ELISA作为筛查试验比RPR表现更好,这与WHO对低流行率献血者梅毒检测的建议一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cd7/11670634/6117d986e7f0/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验