Comparison of low-energy virtual monoenergetic images between photon-counting CT and energy-integrating detectors CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and dose level using a photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanner by comparison with a dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A phantom was scanned using a DSCT and a PCCT with a volume CT dose index of 11 mGy, and additionally at 6 mGy and 1.8 mGy for PCCT. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were evaluated from 40 to 70 keV on VMIs to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (f) and spatial resolution on two iodine inserts (f), respectively. A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of two contrast-enhanced lesions according to the energy level used.

RESULTS

For all energy levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 and 6 mGy, but greater at 1.8 mGy. f values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 mGy (8.6 ± 1.5 [standard deviation [SD]%), similar at 6 mGy (1.6 ± 1.5 [SD]%) and lower at 1.8 mGy (-17.8 ± 2.2 [SD]%). For both inserts, f values were higher with PCCT than DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV levels, except at 6 mGy and 40 keV. d' values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV and both simulated lesions. Similar d' values to those of the DSCT at 11 mGy, were obtained at 2.25 mGy for iodine insert at 2 mg/mL and at 0.96 mGy for iodine insert at 4 mg/mL at 40 keV.

CONCLUSION

Compared to DSCT, PCCT reduces noise magnitude and improves noise texture, spatial resolution and detectability on VMIs for all low-keV levels.