Suppr超能文献

[德国综合医院的出院管理策略:对临床风险管理负责人的全国性调查]

[Discharge management strategies in German general hospitals : A nationwide survey of professionals responsible for clinical risk management].

作者信息

Marsall Matthias, Weigl Matthias, Schmiedhofer Martina, Blum Karl, Rösner Hannah, Strametz Reinhard, Gambashidze Nikoloz

机构信息

Institut für Patientensicherheit (IfPS), Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Gebäude A 02, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.

Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 May;67(5):587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03846-0. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transitions from inpatient care are associated with risks for the safety of patients. In 2017, the framework agreement on discharge management was legally defined. There is currently a lack of empirical data in Germany on the implementation of measures to ensure safe transitions of patients after inpatient care. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the discharge management strategies implemented by German general hospitals.

METHODS

Between March and May 2022, specific discharge management strategies as well as structural and organizational characteristics were assessed in a nationwide survey of 401 general hospitals, and descriptive statistics and group comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Seven of nine strategies surveyed were implemented in > 95% of all hospitals. The evaluation of discharge planning was only implemented in 61% of the hospitals, and systematic documentation, analysis, and evaluation of readmissions in 54%. Hospitals with a higher number of hospital beds reported significantly less often about "early contact with follow-up care providers" and "organization of a seamless transition to follow-up care."

DISCUSSION

A large part of the strategies in discharge management from inpatient treatment is implemented in German general hospitals. However, measures for evaluation and the systematic analysis of discharge processes and readmissions of patients have only been partially implemented. However, these are necessary to systematically evaluate and potentially improve the discharge processes.

摘要

背景

从住院治疗过渡到院外护理与患者安全风险相关。2017年,出院管理框架协议在法律上得到了明确界定。目前在德国,缺乏关于实施措施以确保患者在住院治疗后安全过渡的实证数据。本研究的目的是概述德国综合医院实施的出院管理策略。

方法

在2022年3月至5月期间,对401家综合医院进行了全国性调查,评估了具体的出院管理策略以及结构和组织特征,并进行了描述性统计和组间比较。

结果

所调查的九项策略中有七项在所有医院中的实施率超过95%。出院计划评估仅在61%的医院中实施,而对再入院情况进行系统记录、分析和评估的医院占54%。病床数量较多的医院报告“与后续护理提供者尽早联系”和“组织无缝过渡到后续护理”的情况明显较少。

讨论

德国综合医院实施了住院治疗出院管理策略中的很大一部分。然而,评估措施以及对出院流程和患者再入院情况的系统分析仅得到部分实施。然而,这些对于系统评估和潜在改进出院流程是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17de/11093802/0efde924c116/103_2024_3846_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Discharge management strategies in German general hospitals : A nationwide survey of professionals responsible for clinical risk management].
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 May;67(5):587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03846-0. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
Who is responsible for a safe discharge from hospital? A prospective risk analysis in the German setting.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;113:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 24.
4
[Clinical risk management in german hospitals - does size really matter?].
Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Jun;149(3):301-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270954. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
7
Pediatric primary care providers' perspectives regarding hospital discharge communication: a mixed methods analysis.
Acad Pediatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;15(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
[Discharge management in German hospitals for cognitively impaired, older people-a scoping review].
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Nov;54(7):695-703. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01732-3. Epub 2020 May 7.
10
A cross-national comparison of incident reporting systems implemented in German and Swiss hospitals.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 1;29(3):349-359. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx030.

本文引用的文献

3
Factors associated with early 14-day unplanned hospital readmission: a matched case-control study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06902-6.
4
The Discharge Process-From a Patient's Perspective.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jan 20;6:2377960819900707. doi: 10.1177/2377960819900707. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Measuring care transitions in Sweden: validation of the care transitions measure.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 May 1;30(4):291-297. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy001.
6
The association between patient experience factors and likelihood of 30-day readmission: a prospective cohort study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):683-690. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007184. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
7
Measuring what matters to patients.
BMJ. 2017 Feb 20;356:j816. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j816.
8
Who is responsible for a safe discharge from hospital? A prospective risk analysis in the German setting.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016;113:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 24.
9
Impact of Hospital Population Case-Mix, Including Poverty, on Hospital All-Cause and Infection-Related 30-Day Readmission Rates.
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 15;61(8):1235-43. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ539. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the care transition measure.
PLoS One. 2015 May 22;10(5):e0127403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127403. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验