Suppr超能文献

印度入侵性陆生植物物种的DNA条形码分析

DNA Barcoding of Invasive Terrestrial Plant Species in India.

作者信息

Lonare Nayan, Patil Gayatri, Waghmare Suprriya, Bhor Reshma, Hardikar Hrishikesh, Tembe Sanket

机构信息

Department of Biotechnology, Fergusson College (Autonomous), Shivajinagar, Pune, Maharashtra, 411004, India.

IMT Technologies Pvt. Ltd, Kondhwa Khurd, Pune, Maharashtra, 411048, India.

出版信息

Mol Biotechnol. 2025 Mar;67(3):1027-1034. doi: 10.1007/s12033-024-01102-z. Epub 2024 Mar 2.

Abstract

Invasive plants are known to cause biodiversity loss and pose a major risk to human health and environment. Identification of invasive plants and distinguishing them from native species has been relied on morphological examination. Stringent requirement of floral characters and decreasing number of expert taxonomists are making conventional morphology-based identification system tedious and resource-intensive. DNA barcoding may help in quick identification of invasive species if distinct sequence divergence pattern at various taxonomic levels is observed. The present work evaluates the utility of four molecular markers; rbcL, matK, their combination (rbcL + matK), and psbA-trnH for identification of 37 invasive plant species from India and also in distinguishing them from 97 native species. A psbA-trnH locus was found to be of restricted utility in this work as it was represented by the members of a single family. A hierarchical increase in K2P mean divergence across different taxonomic levels was found to be the maximum for matK alone followed by rbcL + matK and rbcL alone, respectively. NJ clustering analysis, however, confirmed the suitability of combined locus (rbcL + matK) over individual rbcL and matK as the DNA barcode. RbcL showed the lowest resolution power among the three markers studied. MatK exhibited much better performance compared to rbcL alone in identifying most of the species accurately although it failed to show monophyly of genus Dinebra. Two families; Asteraceae and Poaceae, remained polyphyletic in the trees constructed by all three markers. Combined locus (rbcL + matK) was found to be the most suitable marker as it raised the resolution power of both the markers and could identify more than 90% of genera correctly. Phylogenetic tree constructed by Maximum-Parsimony method using combined locus as a molecular marker exhibited the best resolution, thus, supporting the significance of two-locus combination of rbcL + matK for barcoding invasive plant species from India. Present study contributes to the global barcode data of invasive plant species by adding fifty-one new sequences to it. Effective barcoding of additional number of native as well as invasive plant species from India is possible using this dual locus if it is combined with one or more new molecular plastid markers. Expansion of barcode database with a focus on barcode performance optimisation to improve discrimination ability at species level can be undertaken in future.

摘要

已知入侵植物会导致生物多样性丧失,并对人类健康和环境构成重大风险。入侵植物的鉴定以及将它们与本地物种区分开来一直依赖于形态学检查。对花部特征的严格要求以及专业分类学家数量的减少,使得传统的基于形态学的鉴定系统既繁琐又耗费资源。如果在各个分类水平上观察到明显的序列差异模式,DNA条形码可能有助于快速鉴定入侵物种。本研究评估了四种分子标记;rbcL、matK、它们的组合(rbcL + matK)以及psbA-trnH用于鉴定来自印度的37种入侵植物物种,并将它们与97种本地物种区分开来的效用。在本研究中发现psbA-trnH位点的效用有限,因为它仅由一个科的成员代表。发现不同分类水平上K2P平均差异的分层增加,单独的matK最大,其次分别是rbcL + matK和单独的rbcL。然而,NJ聚类分析证实,作为DNA条形码,联合位点(rbcL + matK)比单个的rbcL和matK更合适。在所研究的三个标记中,rbcL的分辨率最低。与单独的rbcL相比,MatK在准确鉴定大多数物种方面表现出更好的性能,尽管它未能显示出Dinebra属的单系性。菊科和禾本科这两个科在所有三个标记构建的树中仍然是多系的。联合位点(rbcL + matK)被发现是最合适的标记,因为它提高了两个标记的分辨率,并且可以正确鉴定超过90%的属。使用联合位点作为分子标记通过最大简约法构建的系统发育树表现出最佳分辨率,因此,支持rbcL + matK的双位点组合对来自印度的入侵植物物种进行条形码分析的重要性。本研究通过向全球入侵植物物种条形码数据中添加51个新序列,为该数据做出了贡献。如果将这个双位点与一个或多个新的分子质体标记结合使用,就有可能对来自印度的更多本地和入侵植物物种进行有效的条形码分析。未来可以专注于条形码性能优化来扩展条形码数据库,以提高物种水平的鉴别能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验