Imaging of the adjacent upper limb: Outcomes and diagnostic yield.

INTRODUCTION

Injuries to extremities are a common presentation to emergency departments and may be associated with multiple abnormalities. Patients may be referred for X-ray imaging of multiple adjacent regions, but the diagnostic outcomes of these X-ray examinations have not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of X-ray examinations of adjacent body regions in the upper limb.

METHODS

Upper limb X-rays examinations performed over six months were collected from two hospitals, and all patients who had adjacent regions X-rayed were included. Using the radiology reports as a reference standard, the diagnostic yield of these additional adjacent X-ray examinations was assessed. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's Chi Square were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

591 patients had 1455 X-ray examinations, ranging from two to six X-ray requests. More than 80% of X-ray examinations were due to an injury, but less than 60% had symptoms mentioned in the clinical history. Overall, 39.1% of initial examinations reported a new finding but only 1.5% of all subsequent imaging had a new abnormality detected. Examinations with symptoms specified in the clinical history were more likely to detect new findings (p=<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Imaging is an essential diagnostic tool in medical settings, but all radiographic tests should be justified, and adjacent imaging has a low diagnostic yield, hence, all limbs should be carefully assessed individually to assess the need for imaging. Every request should be justified based on presentation and symptoms, particularly when multiple areas may be impacted.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiographic imaging is easily accessible but adherence to guidelines and assessing the diagnostic yield of common examinations is important to ensure benefits to patients.