Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified Using Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After Mild COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND

Severe COVID-19 infection is known to alter myocardial perfusion through its effects on the endothelium and microvasculature. However, the majority of patients with COVID-19 infection experience only mild symptoms, and it is unknown if their myocardial perfusion is altered after infection.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to determine if there are abnormalities in myocardial blood flow (MBF), as measured by stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), in individuals after a mild COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, comparative study of individuals who had a prior mild COVID-19 infection (n = 30) and matched controls (n = 26) using stress CMR. Stress and rest myocardial blood flow (sMBF, rMBF) were quantified using the dual sequence technique. Myocardial perfusion reserve was calculated as sMBF/rMBF. Unpaired t-tests were used to test differences between the groups.

RESULTS

The median time interval between COVID-19 infection and CMR was 5.6 (IQR: 4-8) months. No patients with the COVID-19 infection required hospitalization. Symptoms including chest pain, shortness of breath, syncope, and palpitations were more commonly present in the group with prior COVID-19 infection than in the control group (57% vs 7%, < 0.001). No significant differences in rMBF (1.08 ± 0.27 mL/g/min vs 0.97 ± 0.29 mL/g/min, = 0.16), sMBF (3.08 ± 0.79 mL/g/min vs 3.06 ± 0.89 mL/g/min, = 0.91), or myocardial perfusion reserve (2.95 ± 0.90 vs 3.39 ± 1.25, = 0.13) were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that there are no significant abnormalities in rest or stress myocardial perfusion, and thus microvascular function, in individuals after mild COVID-19 infection.