Gold Peter A, McCarthy Thomas F, Borukhov Ilya, Danoff Jonathan
Department of Orthopedics, Panorama Orthopedic & Spine Center, Golden, CO, USA.
Department of Orthopedics, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Feb 26;26:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101326. eCollection 2024 Apr.
There are various traditional landmarks used to estimate the femoral component version, yet none are widely accepted by direct anterior surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare bony landmarks easily accessible to direct anterior surgeons and to estimate which one provides the best estimate of femoral component anteversion.
A computed tomography database was used to identify 736 left entire-femur computed tomography scans. Seven visible anatomic landmarks were identified using a computer model in which a 45° virtual neck resection was made at 10 mm above the lesser trochanter. Thirteen axes, to reference the femoral stem position, were created between the 7 landmarks. Means and standard deviations (SDs) of angles between each axis and the transepicondylar axis (TEA) were compared for their precision.
The traditional lesser trochanter predicted anteversion from the TEA was 34.1° (SD 9.7°). Predicted anteversion from the TEA was 3.3° (SD 8.1°) when aligned from the center of the canal to the middle of the medial calcar; 14.0° (SD 8.1°) from the center of the canal to the anterior 1/3 of the medial calcar; and 24.8° (SD 8.5°) from the center of the canal to the most anterior point on the medial calcar.
Compared to the lesser trochanter, 7 axes were more precise (lower SD) when predicting the version. Estimating the femoral component position, via simulated data, using 3 points along the medial calcar is a relatively precise and easily accessible tool for surgeons.
有多种传统的解剖标志用于估计股骨假体的旋转角度,但没有一种被前路直接入路的外科医生广泛接受。本研究的目的是比较前路直接入路外科医生容易触及的骨性标志,并评估哪一个能最好地估计股骨假体的前倾角。
使用计算机断层扫描数据库识别736例左侧全股骨计算机断层扫描。使用计算机模型识别七个可见的解剖标志,其中在小转子上方10mm处进行45°虚拟颈切除。在七个标志之间创建了13个轴,以参考股骨干的位置。比较每个轴与经髁间轴(TEA)之间角度的平均值和标准差(SD),以评估其精度。
传统的从小转子预测的相对于TEA的前倾角为34.1°(标准差9.7°)。当从髓腔中心对准到内侧骨皮质中部时,相对于TEA预测的前倾角为3.3°(标准差8.1°);从髓腔中心到内侧骨皮质前1/3处为14.0°(标准差8.1°);从髓腔中心到内侧骨皮质最前点为24.8°(标准差8.5°)。
与小转子相比,在预测旋转角度时,7个轴更精确(标准差更低)。通过模拟数据,沿着内侧骨皮质使用三个点来估计股骨假体位置,对外科医生来说是一种相对精确且易于使用的工具。