Zhou Chengqiang, Meng Xiao, Huang Shaolong, Chen Han, Zhou Haibin, Liao Yifeng, Tang Zhongjian, Zhang Xu, Li Hua, Sun Wei, Wang Yunqing
Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26726. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26726. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of different bone cement distribution methods on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).
Raw CT data from a healthy male volunteer was used to create a finite element model of the T12-L2 vertebra using finite element software. A compression fracture was simulated in the L1 vertebra, and two forms of bone cement dispersion (integration group, IG, and separation group, SG) were also simulated. Six types of loading (flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation) were applied to the models, and the stress distribution in the vertebra and intervertebral discs was observed. Additionally, the maximum displacement of the L1 vertebra was evaluated.
Bone cement injection significantly reduced stress following L1 vertebral fractures. In the L1 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was lower than that of IG during flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation. In the T12 vertebral body, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion and right rotation. In the L2 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was the lowest under all loading conditions. In the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion, extension, and left/right bending and was basically the same during left/right rotation. However, in the L1-L2 intervertebral discs, the maximum stress of SG increased during left/right rotation compared with that of IG. Furthermore, the maximum displacement of SG was smaller than that of IG in the L1 vertebral bodies under all loading conditions.
SG can reduce the maximum stress in the vertebra and intervertebral discs, offering better biomechanical performance and improved stability than IG.
本研究旨在比较不同骨水泥分布方法对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)的生物力学影响。
使用有限元软件,利用一名健康男性志愿者的原始CT数据创建T12 - L2椎体的有限元模型。在L1椎体模拟压缩骨折,并模拟两种骨水泥分散形式(整合组,IG;分离组,SG)。对模型施加六种类型的载荷(前屈、后伸、左右侧弯和左右旋转),观察椎体和椎间盘内的应力分布。此外,评估L1椎体的最大位移。
骨水泥注射显著降低了L1椎体骨折后的应力。在L1椎体,SG在屈曲、左右侧弯和左右旋转时的最大应力低于IG。在T12椎体,与IG相比,SG在屈曲和右旋时的最大应力降低。在L2椎体,SG在所有载荷条件下的最大应力最低。在T12 - L1椎间盘,与IG相比,SG在屈曲、后伸和左右侧弯时的最大应力降低,在左右旋转时基本相同。然而,在L1 - L2椎间盘,与IG相比,SG在左右旋转时的最大应力增加。此外,在所有载荷条件下,SG在L1椎体的最大位移均小于IG。
与IG相比,SG可降低椎体和椎间盘内的最大应力,具有更好的生物力学性能和更高的稳定性。