Suppr超能文献

肺癌驱动基因阳性脑转移患者放疗策略的探索

Exploration of radiotherapy strategy for brain metastasis patients with driver gene positivity in lung cancer.

作者信息

Bi Qian, Lian Xin, Shen Jing, Zhang Fuquan, Xu Tao

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2024 Feb 12;15(7):1994-2002. doi: 10.7150/jca.91875. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

To assess the disparities in effectiveness and identify outcome predictors in the treatment of a targeted-first and radiotherapy-first regimen with driver gene-positive lung cancer brain metastases. This retrospective study analyzed patients with driver gene-positive lung cancer brain metastases who received first-targeted and first-radiotherapy regimens, respectively, with SIB-WBRT (whole brain tissue 40 Gy/20 fractions, tumor tissue boosted to 56-60 Gy/20 fractions) and local irradiation (prescription dose range of 20-60 Gy/2-25 fractions, most commonly delivered as 30 Gy/5 fractions, with a BED range of 28-100.8 Gy) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2015 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression free survival (iPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial new lesions, and tumor control. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to depict and estimate iPFS, OS, intracranial new lesions and tumor control. The Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between relevant factors and outcomes. 88 patients were enrolled in targeted-first and radiotherapy-first regimen, totally. And no difference was found in the comparison of iPFS between the two groups (HR=1.180, 95%CI: 0.622-2.237, =0.613). No difference was found in the comparison of OS between the two groups (HR=1.208, 95%CI: 0.679-2.150, =0.520). No difference was found in the comparison of intracranial new lesions between the two groups (HR=1.184, 95%CI: 0.569-2.463, =0.652). There was a difference in the local control time between the two groups, with radiotherapy-first regimen being superior (HR=2.397, 95% CI:1.453-3.954, <0.001). Patient age (HR=1.054, 95%CI: 1.026- 1.082, <0.001), radiotherapy modality (HR=0.128, 95%CI: 0.041-0.401, <0.001), metastasis volume (HR=1.426, 95%CI: 1.209-1.682, <0.001), number of metastases(HR=14.960, 95%CI: 1.990-112.444, =0.009), extracranial disease status (HR=0.387, 95%CI: 0.170-0.880, =0.023) and therapy sequence (HR=13.800, 95%CI: 4.455-42.751, <0.001) were associated with local control. Targeted-first regimen was not found to improve patients' iPFS relative to radiotherapy-first regimen in patients with brain metastases. Radiotherapy-first regimen for brain metastases demonstrated superior local control compared to targeted-first regimen. Patient's age, radiotherapy modality, metastasis volume, number of metastases, extracranial disease status and therapy sequence may be related to local control of metastases.

摘要

评估驱动基因阳性肺癌脑转移患者采用靶向治疗优先和放疗优先方案治疗的疗效差异并确定预后预测因素。这项回顾性研究分析了2015年9月至2021年12月在北京协和医院接受了分别以靶向治疗优先和放疗优先方案治疗的驱动基因阳性肺癌脑转移患者,采用同步整合加量全脑放疗(全脑组织40 Gy/20次分割,肿瘤组织加量至56 - 60 Gy/20次分割)和局部照射(处方剂量范围为20 - 60 Gy/2 - 25次分割,最常见的是30 Gy/5次分割,生物等效剂量范围为28 - 100.8 Gy)。主要终点是颅内无进展生存期(iPFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、颅内新病灶和肿瘤控制情况。采用Kaplan-Meier方法描述和估计iPFS、OS、颅内新病灶和肿瘤控制情况。进行Cox回归分析以评估相关因素与预后之间的关联。共有88例患者分别纳入靶向治疗优先和放疗优先方案组。两组之间的iPFS比较未发现差异(HR = 1.180,95%CI:0.622 - 2.237,P = 0.613)。两组之间的OS比较未发现差异(HR = 1.208,95%CI:0.679 - 2.150,P = 0.520)。两组之间的颅内新病灶比较未发现差异(HR = 1.184,95%CI:0.569 - 2.463,P = 0.652)。两组之间的局部控制时间存在差异,放疗优先方案更优(HR = 2.397,95%CI:1.453 - 3.954,P < 0.001)。患者年龄(HR = 1.054,95%CI:1.026 - 1.082,P < 0.001)、放疗方式(HR = 0.128,95%CI:0.041 - 0.401,P < 0.001)、转移灶体积(HR = 1.426,95%CI:1.209 - 1.682,P < 0.001)、转移灶数量(HR = 14.960,95%CI:1.990 - 112.444,P = 0.009)、颅外疾病状态(HR = 0.387,95%CI:0.170 - 0.880,P = 0.023)和治疗顺序(HR = 13.800,95%CI:4.455 - 42.751,P < 0.001)与局部控制相关。相对于放疗优先方案,在脑转移患者中未发现靶向治疗优先方案能改善患者的iPFS。与靶向治疗优先方案相比,脑转移的放疗优先方案显示出更好的局部控制。患者的年龄、放疗方式、转移灶体积、转移灶数量、颅外疾病状态和治疗顺序可能与转移灶的局部控制有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd9e/10905398/a454fc33b6a2/jcav15p1994g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验