Pärt Tomas, Jeppsson Tobias, Paquet Matthieu, Arlt Debora, Laugen Ane T, Low Matthew, Knape Jonas, Qvarnström Anna, Forslund Pär
Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden.
KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 3;14(3):e11104. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11104. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Current environmental changes may increase temporal variability of life history traits of species thus affecting their long-term population growth rate and extinction risk. If there is a general relationship between environmental variances (EVs) and mean annual survival rates of species, that relationship could be used as a guideline for analyses of population growth and extinction risk for populations, where data on EVs are missing. For this purpose, we present a comprehensive compilation of 252 EV estimates from 89 species belonging to five vertebrate taxa (birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and fish) covering mean annual survival rates from 0.01 to 0.98. Since variances of survival rates are constrained by their means, particularly for low and high mean survival rates, we assessed whether any observed relationship persisted after applying two types of commonly used variance stabilizing transformations: relativized EVs (observed/mathematical maximum) and logit-scaled EVs. With raw EVs at the arithmetic scale, mean-variance relationships of annual survival rates were hump-shaped with small EVs at low and high mean survival rates and higher (and widely variable) EVs at intermediate mean survival rates. When mean annual survival rates were related to relativized EVs the hump-shaped pattern was less distinct than for raw EVs. When transforming EVs to logit scale the relationship between mean annual survival rates and EVs largely disappeared. The within-species juvenile-adult slopes were mainly positive at low (<0.5) and negative at high (>0.5) mean survival rates for raw and relativized variances while these patterns disappeared when EVs were logit transformed. Uncertainties in how to interpret the results of relativized and logit-scaled EVs, and the observed high variation in EV's for similar mean annual survival rates illustrates that extrapolations of observed EVs and tests of life history drivers of survival-EV relationships need to also acknowledge the large variation in these parameters.
当前的环境变化可能会增加物种生活史特征的时间变异性,从而影响其长期种群增长率和灭绝风险。如果环境方差(EVs)与物种的年平均存活率之间存在普遍关系,那么这种关系可作为在缺少EVs数据的情况下分析种群增长和灭绝风险的指导原则。为此,我们全面汇编了来自五个脊椎动物类群(鸟类、哺乳动物、爬行动物、两栖动物和鱼类)的89个物种的252个EV估计值,涵盖了从0.01到0.98的年平均存活率。由于存活率的方差受其均值的限制,特别是对于低和高的平均存活率,我们评估了在应用两种常用的方差稳定变换后,任何观察到的关系是否仍然存在:相对化EVs(观察值/数学最大值)和对数尺度化EVs。在算术尺度下的原始EVs中,年存活率的均值-方差关系呈驼峰状,在低和高平均存活率时EVs较小,而在中等平均存活率时EVs较高(且变化较大)。当年平均存活率与相对化EVs相关时,驼峰状模式不如原始EVs明显。当将EVs转换为对数尺度时,年平均存活率与EVs之间的关系基本消失。对于原始和相对化方差,物种内幼年-成年斜率在低(<0.5)平均存活率时主要为正,在高(>0.5)平均存活率时为负,而当EVs进行对数转换时,这些模式消失。在如何解释相对化和对数尺度化EVs的结果方面存在不确定性,并且对于相似的年平均存活率,观察到的EVs存在高度变化,这表明对观察到的EVs进行外推以及对生存-EV关系的生活史驱动因素进行测试时,还需要认识到这些参数的巨大变化。