Hunt Carly A, Letzen Janelle E, Krimmel Samuel R, Burrowes Shana A B, Haythornthwaite Jennifer A, Keaser Michael, Reid Matthew, Finan Patrick H, Seminowicz David A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, VA, Charlottesville, USA.
Mindfulness (N Y). 2023 Apr;14(4):769-783. doi: 10.1007/s12671-023-02105-8. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have emerged as promising prophylactic episodic migraine treatments. The present study investigated biopsychosocial predictors and outcomes associated with formal, daily-life meditation practice in migraine patients undergoing MBI, and whether augmented mindfulness mechanistically underlies change.
Secondary analyses of clinical trial data comparing a 12-week enhanced mindfulness-based stress reduction course (MBSR + ; = 50) to stress management for headache (SMH; = 48) were conducted.
Pre-treatment mesocorticolimbic system functioning (i.e., greater resting state ventromedial prefrontal cortex-right nucleus accumbens [vmPFC-rNAC] functional connectivity) predicted greater meditation practice duration over MBSR + ( = 0.58, = 0.001), as well as the change in headache frequency from pre- to post-treatment ( = -12.60, = 0.02) such that MBSR + participants with greater vmPFC-rNAC connectivity showed greater reductions in headache frequency. MBSR + participants who meditated more showed greater increases in mindfulness ( = 0.52, = 0.02) and reductions in the helplessness facet of pain catastrophizing ( = -0.13, = 0.01), but not headache frequency, severity, or impact. Augmented mindfulness mediated reductions in headache impact resulting from MBSR + , but not headache frequency.
Mesocorticolimbic system function is implicated in motivated behavior, and thus, motivation-enhancing interventions might be delivered alongside mindfulness-based training to enhance meditation practice engagement. Formal, daily-life meditation practice duration appears to benefit pain-related cognitions, but not clinical pain, while mindfulness emerges as a mechanism of MBIs on headache impact, but not frequency. Further research is needed to investigate the day-to-day effects of formal, daily-life meditation practice on pain, and continue to characterize the specific mechanisms of MBIs on headache outcomes.
This study is not preregistered.
基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)已成为有前景的发作性偏头痛预防性治疗方法。本研究调查了接受MBI的偏头痛患者进行正规的日常生活冥想练习的生物心理社会预测因素和结果,以及增强的正念是否在机制上构成了变化的基础。
对一项临床试验数据进行二次分析,该试验将为期12周的强化基于正念的减压课程(MBSR +;n = 50)与头痛压力管理(SMH;n = 48)进行了比较。
治疗前中脑边缘系统功能(即静息状态下内侧前额叶皮质-右侧伏隔核[vmPFC-rNAC]功能连接性更高)预测了MBSR +组更长的冥想练习时长(β = 0.58,p = 0.001),以及治疗前至治疗后头痛频率的变化(β = -12.60,p = 0.02),即vmPFC-rNAC连接性更高的MBSR +组参与者头痛频率降低幅度更大。冥想更多的MBSR +组参与者正念增加幅度更大(β = 0.52,p = 0.02),疼痛灾难化无助方面的减少幅度更大(β = -0.13,p = 0.01),但头痛频率、严重程度或影响无变化。增强的正念介导了MBSR +导致的头痛影响的降低,但未介导头痛频率的降低。
中脑边缘系统功能与动机行为有关,因此,在基于正念的训练同时实施动机增强干预措施可能会提高冥想练习的参与度。正规的日常生活冥想练习时长似乎有益于与疼痛相关的认知,但对临床疼痛无益处,而正念是MBIs对头痛影响而非频率产生作用的一种机制。需要进一步研究来调查正规的日常生活冥想练习对疼痛的日常影响,并继续明确MBIs对头痛结果的具体机制。
本研究未进行预注册。