• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Immigrants to the United States contribute to society: Here are 3 ways to support their transition.美国的移民为社会做出贡献:以下是支持他们融入的三种方式。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Feb 14;2(3):qxae019. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae019. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Coverage and Framing of Immigration Policy in US Newspapers.美国报纸对移民政策的报道和框架
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):78-101. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12547. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
3
Caught Between a Well-Intentioned State and a Hostile Federal System: Local Implementation of Inclusive Immigrant Policies.夹在善意的州政府和敌对的联邦系统之间:包容性移民政策的地方实施。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1348-1374. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12671. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
The "Oriental" problem: trachoma and Asian immigrants in the United States, 1897-1910.“东方”问题:沙眼与1897年至1910年在美国的亚洲移民
Uisahak. 2014 Dec;23(3):573-606. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2014.23.573.
5
Immigration and migration in America: social impact and social response.美国的移民与人口迁移:社会影响与社会回应。
Int Migr. 1988 Dec;26(4):441-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1988.tb00663.x.
6
"It's for us -newcomers, LGBTQ persons, and HIV-positive persons. You feel free to be": a qualitative study exploring social support group participation among African and Caribbean lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender newcomers and refugees in Toronto, Canada.“这是为我们——新移民、 LGBTQ群体以及艾滋病毒呈阳性者准备的。在这里你可以自在地做自己”:一项定性研究,探索加拿大多伦多的非洲和加勒比地区女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别新移民及难民对社会支持小组参与情况。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jul 2;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0092-0.
7
[Categories of immigrants and "levels of immigration" in Canada: a voluntarist policy].[加拿大的移民类别与“移民层次”:一项自愿主义政策]
Rev Eur Migr Int. 1986 Nov;2(2):145-64.
8
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
9
Immigrant health: legal tools/legal barriers.
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Fall;30(3 Suppl):189-96.
10
One century of foreign immigration to the United States: 1880-1979.1880年至1979年:美国一个世纪的外国移民情况。
Int Migr. 1985 Sep;23(3):309-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1985.tb00322.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Kim et al respond to "Dispersal policies, neighborhood disadvantage, and refugee health in a Nordic context".金等人回应了“北欧背景下的移民政策、社区劣势与难民健康”。
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;194(3):649-650. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae241.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring The Enduring Imprint Of Structural Racism On American Neighborhoods.衡量结构性种族主义对美国社区的持久影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Oct;42(10):1374-1382. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00659.
2
Risk of Psychiatric Disorders Among Refugee Children and Adolescents Living in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods.生活在贫困社区的难民儿童和青少年患精神障碍的风险。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;176(11):1107-1114. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3235.
3
Prenatal WIC Is Associated with Increased Birth Weight of Infants Born in the United States with Immigrant Mothers.孕妇 WIC 项目与移民母亲在美国所生婴儿的出生体重增加有关。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Aug;122(8):1514-1524.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Restoring An Inclusionary Safety Net For Children In Immigrant Families: A Review Of Three Social Policies.为移民家庭的儿童恢复包容性安全网:三项社会政策述评。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jul;40(7):1099-1107. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00206.
5
Spreading Fear: The Announcement Of The Public Charge Rule Reduced Enrollment In Child Safety-Net Programs.传播恐惧:公共负担新规降低了儿童安全网项目的入学率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1752-1761. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00763.
6
Association of Neighborhood Disadvantage With Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Events Among Refugees in Denmark.邻里贫困与丹麦难民心血管风险因素和事件的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2014196. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14196.
7
Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment.通过数据驱动的算法分配来改善难民融入情况。
Science. 2018 Jan 19;359(6373):325-329. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4408.
8
Health consequences of the US Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration programme: a quasi-experimental study.美国“童年入境暂缓遣返”(DACA)移民计划的健康后果:一项准实验研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Apr;2(4):e175-e181. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30047-6. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Protecting unauthorized immigrant mothers improves their children's mental health.保护未经授权的移民母亲有助于改善其子女的心理健康。
Science. 2017 Sep 8;357(6355):1041-1044. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5893. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Providing driver's licenses to unauthorized immigrants in California improves traffic safety.在加利福尼亚州向非法移民发放驾照能提高交通安全。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 18;114(16):4111-4116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618991114. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

美国的移民为社会做出贡献:以下是支持他们融入的三种方式。

Immigrants to the United States contribute to society: Here are 3 ways to support their transition.

作者信息

Hamad Rita

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

出版信息

Health Aff Sch. 2024 Feb 14;2(3):qxae019. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae019. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae019
PMID:38435810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10906102/
Abstract

The number of migrants entering the United States in 2023 shattered records. Despite prevailing narratives, immigrants, on average, contribute substantially to US society. Rather than slamming the door in the faces of newcomers, federal, state, and local policymakers should provide services to these individuals to ensure they have the maximum opportunity to thrive, both for their own benefit and for the greater social good. Public health and social science research provides ample rigorous evidence on the benefits of different types of investments in these vulnerable individuals upon their arrival in our country. In this Commentary, I review 3 examples of potential evidence-based investments: social inclusion, meeting basic needs, and supportive neighborhoods.

摘要

2023年进入美国的移民数量打破了纪录。尽管存在普遍的说法,但平均而言,移民对美国社会做出了巨大贡献。联邦、州和地方政策制定者不应拒绝新来者,而应为这些人提供服务,以确保他们有最大的机会蓬勃发展,这既有利于他们自身,也有利于更大的社会福祉。公共卫生和社会科学研究提供了充分严谨的证据,证明对这些弱势群体在抵达我国后进行不同类型投资的益处。在本评论中,我将审视3个基于证据的潜在投资示例:社会包容、满足基本需求和支持性社区。