Carotid Blood Flow as a Surrogate for Pulse Contour Analysis in Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective, Observational, Single-Centre Study (Contour Study).

Background and objectives The quest for an accurate and reliable non-invasive method of assessing cardiac output in critically ill patients is still ongoing. Carotid artery Doppler is a promising non-invasive, reproducible, and feasible bedside monitor. So we compared the change in cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveforms (pulse contour analysis) with that from carotid artery Doppler-derived measurements, in post-major elective abdominal surgery patients. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective observational study in 30 adult post-major elective abdominal surgery patients admitted to the Gastroenterology and Liver Transplant intensive care unit postoperatively on mechanical ventilator support, who were found to be fluid responsive clinically on passive leg raise (PLR) test. Demographics and vasopressor support were recorded. Hemodynamic parameters including heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), cardiac output (CO) using arterial pulse contour analysis (Vigileo monitor/FloTrac® sensor; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California, United States), and carotid blood flow (CBF) were recorded on the baseline, pre- and post- PLR, and post fluid bolus administration. Balanced salt solution at the rate of 6ml/kg over 20 minutes was given as a fluid bolus. Results Of the 30 patients who were included in the study, 16 patients (53.3%) were on vasopressor support, mean (± SD) age of the patients was 52.93 (± 8.13) years. There was a significant increase in the SBP (mmHg) pre- to post-PLR, that is, 112.2±15.57 and 118.7±14.96, respectively (p-value = 0.001). Also from pre-PLR to post-fluid bolus administration, the increase in SBP was significant, 112.2±15.57 and 121.93±13.96, respectively (p-value = 0.001). The change in cardiac output measured using Vigileo and CBF from pre- to post-PLR (7.66±1.45 to 9.14±1.76, p< 0.001 for Vigileo and 8.10±1.66 to 9.72±1.99, p<0.001 for CBF) and pre-PLR to post fluid administration (7.66±1.45 to 9.39±1.77, p< 0.001 for Vigileo and 8.10±1.66 to 10.31±2.26, p< 0.001 for CBF) were significant. There was a positive correlation between the change in cardiac output as measured from arterial pulse contour analysis technique (Vigileo) and that measured from CBF (r=0.884) pre- and post-PLR. There was a significant correlation between cardiac output measurements derived from two techniques, before PLR, after PLR, and after fluid expansion (p< 0.001 for each variable). The change in cardiac output before PLR and after fluid expansion was also correlated by both the techniques (correlation coefficient being, r=0.781). Conclusion There was a significant positive correlation of the CO (absolute and change) measurements pre- and post-interventions (that is, PLR and fluid bolus administration) as made by pulse contour analysis (Vigileo) and by CBF in post-surgical patients. Pulse wave Doppler of CBF could be used as a surrogate for invasive measures of CO measurement for prediction of fluid responsiveness in this subgroup. Further larger studies can be performed to validate the same.