Kirsch Colin, Rabany Romain, Pon Matthew, Shabanian Julia, Narayanappa Anand
Medical School, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jan 31;16(1):e53301. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53301. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is a common yet life-threatening occurrence across the United States and is typically managed with blood transfusions as the standard of care. However, providers caring for a Jehovah's Witness patient who refuses transfusions due to religious reasons face unique ethical challenges in upholding evidence-based shock resuscitation protocols while respecting the patient's autonomy and faith-based stance that strictly prohibits blood products. We present a complex clinical case of a 46-year-old Jehovah's Witness who developed severe hemorrhagic shock, partial amputation, and critical anemia after a traumatic 40-mile-per-hour motorcycle collision resulting in comminuted fractures and arterial disruption. Despite receiving emergent blood transfusions initially, further transfusions were declined once his identity as a practicing Jehovah's Witness was disclosed. His hemoglobin plunged to dangerously low levels of 4.6 g/dL before stabilizing to 5.3 g/dL with pharmaceutical alternatives including intravenous iron, high-dose erythropoietin, and phlebotomy minimization. Respecting patient convictions while delivering effective evidence-based shock management created significant ethical conflicts given the proven efficacy of blood transfusions. However, this complex case demonstrates that through meticulous medical and surgical care coordinated by a multi-disciplinary team applying customized non-transfusion techniques, traumatic hemorrhagic shock and life-threatening anemia can still achieve favorable outcomes without relying on transfusions when respecting faith-based refusal of blood products.
创伤性失血性休克在美国是一种常见但危及生命的情况,通常以输血作为标准治疗方法。然而,照顾因宗教原因拒绝输血的耶和华见证会患者的医护人员,在坚持基于证据的休克复苏方案的同时,尊重患者的自主权以及严格禁止使用血液制品的基于信仰的立场方面,面临着独特的伦理挑战。我们呈现了一个复杂的临床病例,一名46岁的耶和华见证会信徒,在一场时速40英里的摩托车创伤性碰撞导致粉碎性骨折和动脉破裂后,出现了严重的失血性休克、部分截肢和严重贫血。尽管最初接受了紧急输血,但一旦他作为一名虔诚的耶和华见证会信徒的身份被披露,他就拒绝了进一步的输血。在使用包括静脉注射铁剂、高剂量促红细胞生成素和尽量减少放血等药物替代方法之前,他的血红蛋白降至危险的低水平,即4.6 g/dL,之后稳定在5.3 g/dL。鉴于输血已被证实的疗效,在尊重患者信念的同时提供有效的基于证据的休克管理引发了重大的伦理冲突。然而,这个复杂的病例表明,通过由多学科团队协调的精心医疗和手术护理,应用定制的非输血技术,在尊重基于信仰拒绝血液制品的情况下,创伤性失血性休克和危及生命的贫血仍然可以在不依赖输血的情况下取得良好的结果。