Morgan M G, Slovic P, Nair I, Geisler D, MacGregor D, Fischhoff B, Lincoln D, Florig K
Risk Anal. 1985 Jun;5(2):139-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00161.x.
The perception of the potential risk arising from human exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields was studied with a quasi-random sample of 116 well-educated, opinion leaders using the risk perception framework previously developed by Slovic, Fischhoff, and Lichtenstein. These individuals rated exposure to fields from transmission lines and electric blankets on a variety of scales that have been found useful in characterizing people's risk attitudes and perceptions. These judgments allowed us to conjecture about the likely desire for regulation of these potential hazards and the likely response to a publicized problem (e.g., an accident or ominous research finding) involving these two sources of exposure. Various forms of detailed information about 50/60 Hz fields were supplied to respondents. The provision of information produced modest, but statistically significant, changes in perceptions in the direction of greater concern about the risks. In response to questions of public policy, participants desired modest regulatory control of field exposure from transmission lines and little or no control of field exposure from appliances like electric blankets.
我们使用斯洛维奇、菲施霍夫和利希滕斯坦之前开发的风险认知框架,对116名受过良好教育的意见领袖组成的准随机样本进行了研究,以了解人类接触50/60赫兹电场和磁场所产生的潜在风险认知。这些人对来自输电线路和电热毯的磁场暴露在各种量表上进行了评分,这些量表已被证明有助于描述人们的风险态度和认知。这些判断使我们能够推测对这些潜在危害进行监管的可能愿望,以及对涉及这两种暴露源的公开问题(如事故或不祥的研究发现)的可能反应。向受访者提供了关于50/60赫兹磁场的各种详细信息。信息的提供使认知产生了适度但在统计学上显著的变化,朝着更关注风险的方向发展。在回答公共政策问题时,参与者希望对输电线路的磁场暴露进行适度监管控制,而对电热毯等电器的磁场暴露几乎不进行控制或完全不进行控制。