Suppr超能文献

改良休克指数与休克指数预测初产妇产后大出血大量输血的比较:一项回顾性研究。

Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2024 Mar 4;30:e943286. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943286.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The modified shock index (MSI) is calculated as the ratio of heart rate (HR) to mean arterial pressure (MAP) and has been used to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) in trauma patients. This retrospective study from a single center aimed to compare the MSI with the traditional shock index (SI) to predict the need for MT in 612 women diagnosed with primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) at the Emergency Department (ED) between January 2004 and August 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patients were divided into the MT group and the non-MT group. The predictive power of MSI and SI was compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS Out of 612 patients, 105 (17.2%) required MT. The MT group had higher median values than the non-MT group for MSI (1.58 vs 1.07, P<0.001) and SI (1.22 vs 0.80, P<0.001). The AUC for MSI, with a value of 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.778-0.841), did not demonstrate a significant difference compared to the AUC for SI, which was 0.829 (95% CI, 0.797-0.858) (P=0.066). The optimal cutoff values for MSI and SI were 1.34 and 1.07, respectively. The specificity and PPV for MT were 77.1% and 40.2% for MSI, and 83.2% and 45.9% for SI. CONCLUSIONS Both MSI and SI were effective in predicting MT in patients with primary PPH. However, MSI did not demonstrate superior performance to SI.

摘要

背景

改良休克指数(MSI)通过心率(HR)与平均动脉压(MAP)的比值计算得出,已被用于预测创伤患者是否需要大量输血(MT)。本研究为单中心回顾性研究,旨在比较 MSI 与传统休克指数(SI),以预测 2004 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月在急诊科(ED)诊断为原发性产后出血(PPH)的 612 名女性患者是否需要 MT。

材料与方法

患者分为 MT 组和非 MT 组。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较 MSI 和 SI 的预测能力。计算灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值。

结果

612 例患者中,105 例(17.2%)需要 MT。MT 组的 MSI(1.58 比 1.07,P<0.001)和 SI(1.22 比 0.80,P<0.001)中位数均高于非 MT 组。MSI 的 AUC 值为 0.811(95%CI,0.778-0.841),与 SI 的 AUC 值 0.829(95%CI,0.797-0.858)相比,无显著差异(P=0.066)。MSI 和 SI 的最佳截断值分别为 1.34 和 1.07。MSI 和 SI 预测 MT 的特异度和 PPV 分别为 77.1%和 40.2%,83.2%和 45.9%。

结论

MSI 和 SI 均能有效预测原发性 PPH 患者 MT。然而,MSI 与 SI 相比,并无明显优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82f1/10921966/745147e2a7cf/medscimonit-30-e943286-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验