Suppr超能文献

影响外科医生科学家学术生产力和满意度的因素:一项全国性调查。

Factors Impacting Academic Productivity and Satisfaction of Surgeon-scientists: A Nationwide Survey.

作者信息

Marincola Smith Paula, Martinez Amy, Irlmeier Rebecca, Solórzano Carmen C, Magge Deepa, Ye Fei, Goldenring James R

机构信息

Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Surgery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):445-453. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006254. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors related to research success for academic surgeons.

BACKGROUND

Many recognize mounting barriers to scientific success for academic surgeons, but little is known about factors that predict success for individual surgeons.

METHODS

A phase 1 survey was emailed to department chairpersons at highly funded U.S. departments of surgery. Participating chairpersons distributed a phase 2 survey to their faculty surgeons. Training and faculty-stage exposures and demographic data were collected and compared with participant-reported measures of research productivity. Five primary measures of productivity were assessed, including the number of grants applied for, grants funded, papers published, first/senior author papers published, and satisfaction with research.

RESULTS

Twenty chairpersons and 464 faculty surgeons completed the survey, and 444 faculty responses were included in the final analysis. Having a research-focused degree was significantly associated with more grants applied for [Doctor of Philosophy, incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 6.93; Masters, IRR = 4.34] and funded (Doctor of Philosophy, IRR = 4.74; Masters, IRR = 4.01) compared with surgeons with only clinical degrees (all P < 0.01). Having a formal research mentor was significantly associated with more grants applied for (IRR = 1.57, P = 0.03) and higher satisfaction in research (IRR = 2.22, P < 0.01). Contractually protected research time was significantly associated with more grants applied for (IRR = 3.73), grants funded (IRR = 2.14), papers published (IRR = 2.12), first/senior authors published (IRR = 1.72), and research satisfaction (odds ratio = 2.15; all P < 0.01). The primary surgeon-identified barrier to research productivity was lack of protection from clinical burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons pursuing research-focused careers should consider the benefits of attaining a research-focused degree, negotiating for contractually protected research time, and obtaining formal research mentorship.

摘要

目的

确定与学术外科医生研究成功相关的因素。

背景

许多人认识到学术外科医生在科研成功方面面临越来越多的障碍,但对于预测个体外科医生成功的因素知之甚少。

方法

向美国资金充裕的外科系主任发送了第一阶段调查问卷。参与调查的系主任向其外科教员分发了第二阶段调查问卷。收集了培训和教员阶段的经历以及人口统计学数据,并与参与者报告的研究生产力指标进行比较。评估了生产力的五项主要指标,包括申请的资助数量、获得资助的数量、发表的论文数量、作为第一作者/资深作者发表的论文数量以及对研究的满意度。

结果

20位系主任和464位外科教员完成了调查,最终分析纳入了444位教员的回复。与仅有临床学位的外科医生相比,拥有以研究为重点的学位与申请更多资助(哲学博士,发病率比[IRR]=6.93;硕士,IRR=4.34)和获得资助(哲学博士,IRR=4.74;硕士,IRR=4.01)显著相关(所有P<0.01)。有正式的研究导师与申请更多资助(IRR=1.57,P=0.03)和更高的研究满意度(IRR=2.22,P<0.01)显著相关。合同保障的研究时间与申请更多资助(IRR=3.73)、获得资助(IRR=2.14)、发表论文(IRR=2.12)、作为第一作者/资深作者发表论文(IRR=1.72)以及研究满意度(优势比=2.15;所有P<0.01)显著相关。外科医生认为影响研究生产力的主要障碍是缺乏临床负担方面的保障。

结论

追求以研究为重点职业的外科医生应考虑获得以研究为重点的学位、争取合同保障研究时间以及获得正式研究指导的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca8/11809735/d353e8034ea6/sla-281-445-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验