• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先进内镜在阑尾息肉治疗和结果中的作用。

The role of advanced endoscopy in appendiceal polyp management and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2267-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10726-w. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10726-w
PMID:38438673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal orifice lesions are often managed operatively with limited or oncologic resections. The aim is to report the management of appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms using advanced endoscopic interventions.

METHODS

Patients with appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms who underwent advanced endoscopic resections between 2011 and 2021 with either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD), hybrid ESD, or combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) were included from a prospectively collected dataset. Patient and lesion details and procedure outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

Out of 1005 lesions resected with advanced endoscopic techniques, 41 patients (4%) underwent appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasm resection, including 39% by hybrid ESD, 34% by ESD, 15% by EMR, and 12% by CELS. The median age was 65, and 54% were male. The median lesion size was 20 mm. The dissection was completed piecemeal in 49% of patients. Post-procedure, one patient had a complication within 30 days and was admitted with post-polypectomy abdominal pain treated with observation for 2 days with no intervention. Pathology revealed 49% sessile-serrated lesions, 24% tubular adenomas, and 15% tubulovillous adenomas. Patients were followed up for a median of 8 (0-48) months. One patient with a sessile-serrated lesion experienced a recurrence after EMR which was re-resected with EMR.

CONCLUSION

Advanced endoscopic interventions for appendiceal orifice mucosal neoplasms can be performed with a low rate of complications and early recurrence. While conventionally lesions at the appendiceal orifice are often treated with surgical resection, advanced endoscopic interventions are an alternative approach with promising results which allow for cecal preservation.

摘要

背景

阑尾口病变通常采用有限或肿瘤切除术进行手术治疗。本研究旨在报告使用先进的内镜介入治疗阑尾口黏膜肿瘤的处理方法。

方法

从前瞻性收集的数据集中纳入了 2011 年至 2021 年间接受先进内镜切除术(包括内镜黏膜切除术[EMR]、内镜黏膜下剥离术[ESD]、混合 ESD 或联合内镜腹腔镜手术[CELS])治疗的阑尾口黏膜肿瘤患者。报告患者和病变详细信息及手术结果。

结果

在 1005 例采用先进内镜技术切除的病变中,有 41 例(4%)患者行阑尾口黏膜肿瘤切除术,其中 39%采用混合 ESD、34%采用 ESD、15%采用 EMR、12%采用 CELS。中位年龄为 65 岁,54%为男性。中位病变大小为 20mm。49%的患者分次整块切除。术后 1 例患者在 30 天内出现并发症,因经内镜切除息肉后腹痛而住院,给予观察 2 天,未进行干预。病理结果显示 49%为无蒂锯齿状病变、24%为管状腺瘤、15%为管状绒毛状腺瘤。患者中位随访时间为 8(0-48)个月。1 例无蒂锯齿状病变患者在接受 EMR 治疗后复发,再次接受 EMR 切除。

结论

对于阑尾口黏膜肿瘤,先进的内镜介入治疗可实现低并发症率和早期复发率。传统上,阑尾口的病变通常采用手术切除治疗,而先进的内镜介入治疗是一种替代方法,具有令人鼓舞的结果,可保留盲肠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/3009813d8a13/464_2024_10726_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/4efe72099c74/464_2024_10726_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/d53e726a2ccc/464_2024_10726_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/3009813d8a13/464_2024_10726_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/4efe72099c74/464_2024_10726_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/d53e726a2ccc/464_2024_10726_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/10978627/3009813d8a13/464_2024_10726_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of advanced endoscopy in appendiceal polyp management and outcomes.先进内镜在阑尾息肉治疗和结果中的作用。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2267-2272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10726-w. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Are large ileocecal valve lesions amenable with advanced endoscopic management to avoid bowel resection?大回盲瓣病变是否可以通过先进的内镜治疗来避免肠切除?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5320-5325. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10014-z. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Combined Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Extended Laparoscopic Appendectomy for the Treatment of Periappendiceal, Cecal, and Appendiceal Adenomas.联合内镜下黏膜切除术与扩大腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾周围、盲肠及阑尾腺瘤
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
4
Expanding endoscopic boundaries: Endoscopic resection of large appendiceal orifice polyps with endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.拓展内镜边界:采用内镜黏膜切除术和内镜黏膜下剥离术对阑尾开口处大息肉进行内镜切除。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 May 16;15(5):386-396. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.386.
5
Underwater EMR of adenomas of the appendiceal orifice (with video).阑尾开口处腺瘤的水下内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar;83(3):638-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.079. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗累及阑尾口的侧向伸展肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5444-5450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5598-6. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Endoscopic Resection of Cecal Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A KASID Multicenter Study.涉及阑尾开口的盲肠息肉内镜切除术:一项KASID多中心研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Nov;62(11):3138-3148. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4760-2. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
[Clinical characteristics of appendix orifice polyps and the effect endoscopic super minimally invasive treatment].[阑尾开口息肉的临床特征及内镜超微创治疗效果]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 10;104(35):3342-3346. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240124-00181.
10
Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.散发性十二指肠腺瘤的内镜切除:内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)与内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)混合技术的比较及迟发性出血风险
Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1594-600. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3356-y. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A standardized surgical approach to appendiceal orifice tumors: a case report.阑尾开口肿瘤的标准化手术方法:病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Apr 30;2025(5):rjaf259. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf259. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Colectomy for polyps is associated with high risk for complications and low risk for malignancy: Time for endoluminal surgery?息肉切除术与高并发症风险和低恶性风险相关:是时候进行腔内手术了吗?
Am J Surg. 2022 Mar;223(3):463-467. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.030. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.北美内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项大型前瞻性多中心研究。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jun;160(7):2317-2327.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
3
Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps: A 10-Year Nationwide Analysis.
非恶性结直肠息肉手术后的发病率和死亡率:一项 10 年的全国性分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov;114(11):1802-1810. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000407.
4
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in special locations.特殊部位的大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr 16;11(4):262-270. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.262.
5
Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions.北美保肛手术经验:复杂结直肠病变的先进内镜方法。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3114-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6026-2. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
6
Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: A case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy.经内镜切除的结直肠息肉的处理:先进内镜手术与腹腔镜结肠切除术的病例对照比较。
Surgery. 2018 Mar;163(3):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.057. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Increasing Rates of Surgery for Patients With Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps in the United States.美国非恶性结直肠息肉患者手术率上升。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr;154(5):1352-1360.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
8
Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.单一家意中心的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和杂交 ESD 治疗结直肠肿瘤的切除效果和复发率。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2328-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5928-8. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Endoscopic Resection of Cecal Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A KASID Multicenter Study.涉及阑尾开口的盲肠息肉内镜切除术:一项KASID多中心研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Nov;62(11):3138-3148. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4760-2. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗累及阑尾口的侧向伸展肿瘤。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5444-5450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5598-6. Epub 2017 May 31.