Suppr超能文献

北美保肛手术经验:复杂结直肠病变的先进内镜方法。

Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions.

机构信息

Desk A-30, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3114-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6026-2. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Need for colon sparing interventions for premalignant lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic excision has stimulated interest in advanced endoscopic approaches. The aim of this study was to report a single institution's experience with these techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively collected database of all patients referred between 2011 and 2015 for colorectal resection of benign appearing deemed endoscopically unresectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. Patients were counseled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with possible combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) or alternatively colorectal resection if unable to resect endoscopically or suspicion for cancer. Lesion characteristic, resection rate, complications, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

110 patients were analyzed [mean age 64 years, female gender 55 (50%), median body mass index 29.4 kg/m]. Indications for interventions were large polyp median endoscopic size 3 cm (range 1.5-6.5) and/or difficult location [cecum (34.9%), ascending colon (22.7%), transverse colon (14.5%), hepatic flexure (11.8%), descending colon (6.3%), sigmoid colon (3.6%), rectum (3.6%), and splenic flexure (2.6%)]. Lesion morphology was sessile (N = 98, 93%) and pedunculated (N = 12, 7%). Successful endoscopic resection rate was 88.2% (N = 97): ESD in 69 patients and CELS in 28 patients. Complication rate was 11.8% (13/110) [delayed bleeding (N = 4), perforation (N = 3), organ-space surgical site infection (SSI) (N = 2), superficial SSI (N = 1), and postoperative ileus (N = 3)]. Out of 110 patients, 13 patients (11.8%) required colectomy for technical failure (7 patients) or carcinoma (6 patients). During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 6-41 months), 2 patients had adenoma recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced endoscopic surgery appears to be a safe and effective alternative to colectomy for patients with complex premalignant lesions deemed unresectable with conventional endoscopic techniques.

摘要

背景

对于无法通过传统内镜切除的癌前病变,需要进行结肠保留干预,这激发了对先进内镜方法的兴趣。本研究的目的是报告一家机构在这些技术方面的经验。

方法

对 2011 年至 2015 年间因良性外观而被认为通过传统内镜技术无法切除的结直肠切除术患者进行了前瞻性收集数据库的回顾性分析。对内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与可能联合内镜腹腔镜手术(CELS)或如果无法内镜切除或怀疑癌症的结直肠切除术进行了咨询。评估了病变特征、切除率、并发症和结果。

结果

分析了 110 例患者[平均年龄 64 岁,女性 55 例(50%),平均体重指数 29.4kg/m]。干预的适应证为大息肉内镜下平均大小 3cm(范围 1.5-6.5cm)和/或位置困难[盲肠(34.9%)、升结肠(22.7%)、横结肠(14.5%)、肝曲(11.8%)、降结肠(6.3%)、乙状结肠(3.6%)、直肠(3.6%)和脾曲(2.6%)]。病变形态为无蒂(N=98,93%)和有蒂(N=12,7%)。内镜切除成功率为 88.2%(N=97):69 例患者行 ESD,28 例患者行 CELS。并发症发生率为 11.8%(13/110)[延迟性出血(N=4)、穿孔(N=3)、器官间隙手术部位感染(SSI)(N=2)、浅表 SSI(N=1)和术后肠梗阻(N=3)]。在 110 例患者中,有 13 例(11.8%)患者因技术失败(7 例)或癌(6 例)而需要结肠切除术。中位随访 16 个月(范围 6-41 个月)后,2 例患者有腺瘤复发。

结论

对于传统内镜技术认为无法切除的复杂癌前病变患者,先进的内镜手术似乎是一种安全有效的结直肠切除术替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验