• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用人为因素和系统模拟方法为一项数百万美元的医疗保健决策提供信息。

Applying Human Factors and Systems Simulation Methods to Inform a Multimillion-Dollar Healthcare Decision.

作者信息

Dubé Mirette, Martel Jessica, Kumagai Jason, Suddes Michael, Cullen Janice, Laberge Jason

机构信息

Alberta Health Services, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

HERD. 2024 Jul;17(3):209-219. doi: 10.1177/19375867241229078. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1177/19375867241229078
PMID:38439644
Abstract

PURPOSE

This article describes a case study of a collaborative human factors (HF) and systems-focused simulation (SFS) project to evaluate potential patient and staff safety risks associated with a multimillion-dollar design and construction decision.

BACKGROUND

The combined integration of HF and SFS methods in healthcare related to testing and informing the design of new environments and processes is underutilized. Few realize the effectiveness of this integration in healthcare to reduce risk and improve decision-making, safety, design, efficiency, patient experience, and outcomes. This project showcases how the combined use of HF and SFS methods can provide objective evidence to help inform decisions.

METHODS

The project was initiated by a healthcare executive team looking for an objective, user informed analysis of a current connector passageway between two existing buildings. The goal was to understand the implications of keeping the current route for simultaneous use for public and patients service flow versus building and financing a new passageway for separate flow and transport. An interprofessional team of intensive care unit professionals participated in two simulations designed to test the current connector. A failure mode and effects analysis and qualitative debrief feedback was used to evaluate risks and potential failures.

RESULTS

The evaluation resulted in data that enabled informed executive decision making for the most effective, efficient, and safest option for public, staff, and patient transport between two buildings. This evaluation resulted in the decision to go forward with building a multimillion-dollar new connector passageway to improve integrated care and transport.

摘要

目的

本文描述了一个关于人为因素(HF)与以系统为重点的模拟(SFS)合作项目的案例研究,该项目旨在评估与一项数百万美元的设计和建设决策相关的潜在患者和工作人员安全风险。

背景

在医疗保健领域,将HF和SFS方法结合用于测试和指导新环境及流程设计的做法未得到充分利用。很少有人意识到这种结合在医疗保健中对于降低风险、改善决策、提高安全性、优化设计、提升效率、改善患者体验及结果方面的有效性。该项目展示了HF和SFS方法的联合使用如何能够提供客观证据以辅助决策。

方法

该项目由一个医疗保健执行团队发起,他们寻求对两座现有建筑之间当前连接通道进行客观的、基于用户意见的分析。目标是了解维持当前通道供公众和患者服务流同时使用,与建造并资助一条用于分流和运输的新通道相比,各自的影响。一个由重症监护室专业人员组成的跨专业团队参与了两次旨在测试当前连接通道的模拟。采用故障模式和影响分析以及定性的汇报反馈来评估风险和潜在故障。

结果

评估得出的数据使管理层能够做出明智决策,确定在两座建筑之间实现公众、工作人员和患者运输的最有效、高效和安全的方案。该评估结果促使决定推进建造一条数百万美元的新连接通道,以改善综合护理和运输。

相似文献

1
Applying Human Factors and Systems Simulation Methods to Inform a Multimillion-Dollar Healthcare Decision.应用人为因素和系统模拟方法为一项数百万美元的医疗保健决策提供信息。
HERD. 2024 Jul;17(3):209-219. doi: 10.1177/19375867241229078. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Design Thinking-Informed Simulation: An Innovative Framework to Test, Evaluate, and Modify New Clinical Infrastructure.设计思维导向模拟:测试、评估和修改新临床基础设施的创新框架。
Simul Healthc. 2020 Jun;15(3):205-213. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000408.
3
Evaluations for New Healthcare Environment Commissioning and Operational Decision Making Using Simulation and Human Factors: A Case Study of an Interventional Trauma Operating Room.运用仿真和人因学对新医疗环境的委托和运行决策进行评估:以一个介入性创伤手术室为例
HERD. 2021 Oct;14(4):442-456. doi: 10.1177/1937586721999668. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.
6
Evidence-Based and Value-Based Decision Making About Healthcare Design: An Economic Evaluation of the Safety and Quality Outcomes.基于证据和价值的医疗保健设计决策:对安全和质量结果的经济评估。
HERD. 2015 Summer;8(4):58-76. doi: 10.1177/1937586715586393.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.计算机化决策支持系统对护理及相关健康专业人员绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述与用户情境化分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(40):1-93. doi: 10.3310/GRNM5147.
9
It's time for the mandatory use of simulation and human factors in hospital design.现在是时候在医院设计中强制使用模拟和人为因素了。
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Aug;44(4):547-549. doi: 10.1071/AH19114.
10
Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.制定化疗治疗单元的高效排班模板:一项案例研究。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(10):575-88. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.837. Epub 2011 Oct 31.