Öcal Osman, Kimm Melanie Alexandra, Hoang Thi Phuong Thao, Pech Maciej, Öcal Elif, Ben Khaled Najib, Sangro Bruno, Ricke Jens, Seidensticker Max, Wildgruber Moritz
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
JHEP Rep. 2023 Dec 27;6(4):100995. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100995. eCollection 2024 Apr.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Herein we used data derived from the SORAMIC trial to explore the predictive value of systemic inflammatory markers (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR]) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib monotherapy or the combination of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)/sorafenib.
Patients randomized to sorafenib monotherapy or SIRT/sorafenib within the per-protocol population of the SORAMIC trial were evaluated in this exploratory analysis. The median baseline values of NLR and PLR were used as cut-off values to describe subgroups. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were used to evaluate median survival in the sorafenib and SIRT/sorafenib arms in each subgroup. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was applied to eliminate the effect of confounding factors.
A total of 275 patients with a median overall survival of 12.4 months were included in this analysis. The median NLR value of the cohort was 2.77 and the median PLR was 26.5. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the sorafenib and SIRT/sorafenib arms in patients with low NLR ( = 0.72) and PLR ( = 0.35) values. In patients with high NLR values, there was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival between SIRT/sorafenib and sorafenib cohorts (12.1 . 9.2 months, = 0.21). In patients with high PLR values, overall survival in the SIRT/sorafenib arm was significantly longer than in the sorafenib arm (15.9 . 11.0 months, = 0.029). This significant difference was preserved in the multivariable analysis (SIRT/sorafenib arm: hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.96, = 0.03) incorporating age, Child-Pugh grade, and alpha-fetoprotein levels.
PLR is a potential predictive factor of benefit from additional SIRT in patients with HCC receiving sorafenib therapy. The potential predictive value of PLR should be further evaluated in future trials.
Systemic therapies are the mainstay of treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at advanced stages. However, not all patients respond well to these treatments. In our analysis, using blood test parameters showing systemic inflammation status, we were able to identify patients who would benefit more from combined treatment with a locoregional treatment of radioembolization (or selective internal radiation therapy).
在此,我们使用来自SORAMIC试验的数据,探讨全身炎症标志物(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值[NLR]和血小板与淋巴细胞比值[PLR])在接受索拉非尼单药治疗或选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)/索拉非尼联合治疗的晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的预测价值。
在这项探索性分析中,对SORAMIC试验符合方案人群中随机接受索拉非尼单药治疗或SIRT/索拉非尼治疗的患者进行了评估。使用NLR和PLR的基线中位数作为临界值来描述亚组。采用带有对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier曲线来评估各亚组中索拉非尼组和SIRT/索拉非尼组的中位生存期。应用多变量Cox回归分析以消除混杂因素的影响。
本分析共纳入275例患者,中位总生存期为12.4个月。该队列的NLR中位数为2.77,PLR中位数为26.5。NLR(P = 0.72)和PLR(P = 0.35)值较低的患者中,索拉非尼组和SIRT/索拉非尼组的总生存期无显著差异。在NLR值较高的患者中,SIRT/索拉非尼组和索拉非尼组的中位总生存期无统计学显著差异(12.1对9.2个月,P = 0.21)。在PLR值较高的患者中,SIRT/索拉非尼组的总生存期显著长于索拉非尼组(15.9对11.0个月,P = 0.029)。在纳入年龄、Child-Pugh分级和甲胎蛋白水平的多变量分析中,这一显著差异仍然存在(SIRT/索拉非尼组:风险比0.65,95%置信区间0.44 - 0.96,P = 0.03)。
PLR是接受索拉非尼治疗的HCC患者从额外的SIRT治疗中获益的潜在预测因素。PLR的潜在预测价值应在未来试验中进一步评估。
全身治疗是晚期肝细胞癌患者治疗的主要手段。然而,并非所有患者对这些治疗反应良好。在我们的分析中,通过显示全身炎症状态的血液检测参数,我们能够识别出从联合局部放射栓塞治疗(或选择性内放射治疗)中获益更多的患者。