Research Unit for Neuronal Plasticity and Repair, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3268-3278. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12274-8. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
Limited resources often hinder regular cognitive assessment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) in standard clinical care. A self-administered iPad®-based cognitive screening-tool (Processing Speed Test; PST) might mitigate this problem.
To evaluate the PST in clinical routine.
We investigated the feasibility of the PST in both a quiet and a waiting room setting. We assessed the validity of the PST in comparison with the established Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). We explored associations between processing speed assessments and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, and psychological factors. Additionally, we explored the ability of the PST to detect impairment in processing speed compared to the SDMT.
The PST was feasible in the waiting room setting. PST and SDMT correlated comparably with the BICAMS, MRI parameters, and psychological variables. Of 172 pwMS, 50 (30.8%) showed cognitive impairment according to the BICAMS; respective values were 47 (27.3%) for the SDMT and 9 (5.2%) for the PST.
The PST performed in a waiting room setting correlates strongly with established cognitive tests. It thus may be used to assess processing speed in a resource-efficient manner and complement cognitive assessment in clinical routine. Despite comparable validity of the PST and SDMT, we identified more pwMS with impaired processing speed using normative data of the SDMT compared to the PST and advise caution, that the common cut-off score of - 1.5 SD from the current PST is not appropriate in Europe.
在标准临床护理中,有限的资源通常会阻碍对多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者进行常规认知评估。基于 iPad 的自我管理认知筛查工具(处理速度测试;PST)可能会缓解这个问题。
评估 PST 在临床常规中的应用。
我们在安静的诊室环境和候诊室环境中分别评估了 PST 的可行性。我们将 PST 的有效性与既定的符号数字模态测试(SDMT)进行了比较。我们探讨了处理速度评估与简短国际认知评估多发性硬化症(BICAMS)、磁共振成像(MRI)参数和心理因素之间的关联。此外,我们还探讨了 PST 检测处理速度障碍的能力与 SDMT 的比较。
PST 在候诊室环境中是可行的。PST 和 SDMT 与 BICAMS、MRI 参数和心理变量具有相似的相关性。在 172 名 pwMS 中,根据 BICAMS,有 50 名(30.8%)存在认知障碍;SDMT 分别为 47 名(27.3%),PST 为 9 名(5.2%)。
在候诊室环境中进行的 PST 与既定的认知测试具有很强的相关性。因此,它可以用于以资源高效的方式评估处理速度,并在临床常规中补充认知评估。尽管 PST 和 SDMT 的有效性相当,但我们发现使用 SDMT 的正常数据,与 PST 相比,更多的 pwMS 存在处理速度障碍,建议谨慎使用,目前 PST 的-1.5 个标准差的常见截断值可能不适合欧洲人群。